SU0014114 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. For each project phase, maintain records of (1) the construction start and end dates and (2) the date of issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, if applicable. b. Applicant shall obtain an Authority to Construct prior to construction. cD Applicant shall comply with applicable District rules pertinent to the project. 8. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION a. At Intersection #3 (SR 33/I-5 Southbound Ramps/Lehman Road), the TIS recommends the followings mitigation alternatives: 1. Convert and restripe the southbound approach to have two thru lanes with shared turning movements and a subsequent lane drop downstream of the intersection and extend the southbound shared through and leftturn lane to be 250 feet, or further based on HDM standards. 2. Install a traffic signal and a northbound left turn lane. 3. Either improvement would mitigate the southbound left turn queues exceeding the storage capacity under Cumulative Plus Project conditions however, Caltrans prefers the intersection signalization which would be safer as this is a four -legged intersection. Per Appendix E, Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets, Signal Warrant is met under EPAP, EPAP+P, Cumulative, Cumulative + P. b. Intersection #3's southbound left turn lane on Ahern Road is coded 180 feet in Synchro but the report suggests 250 feet. Please refer to Table 9.3 and 9.4 of the mitigation sections. The southbound left turn lane should be extended to 300 feet storage plus taper and deceleration length in order to avoid thru lane blocking under EPAP, EPAP+P, Cumulative, and Cumulative + P. c. The northbound left turn lane on Ahern Road (SR 33) at Intersection #3 should also be extended fI om 200 feet to 300 feet as there is room for both NB and SB left turn extensions. d. Some portions of the I-5 ramps and SR 33 Access Road are access restricted. A more detailed map showing the project site's location in relation to the I-5 ramps and SR 33 Access Road is needed to confirm that the proposed project does not conflict with those access restrictions. Please submit this map to Caltrans for review and comment prior to project approval. The revised site plan should show roadway stations and distance to verify with the access control. According to State R/W map, the proposed driveway needed to be beyond station 12+50. Also, for on-ramp future widenings a 12400t lane and 8400t shoulder is well within the 50 feet shown in this map. Please provide a detailed site plan to show where (station to verify the location of the proposed driveway) the proposed access driveway would be as reference to this map. e. All construction must be set back at least 20 feet from the State Right -of -Way for future improvements to the I-5 ramp and the SR 33 access road. fI The above setback will require the relocation of the proposed storage basin. Please submit to Caltrans for review and comment the pre and post construction runoff calculations and drainage plans to understand flow patterns. 1. The proposed site development is near the state route. The developer needs to ensure that the existing State drainage facilities will not be significantly impacted by the project. If historical undeveloped topography shows drainage from this site flowed into the State Right -of -Way, it may continue to do so with the conditions that peak flows may not be increased from the pre - construction quantity and the site runoff be treated to meet present storm water quality standards. If historical undeveloped topography shows drainage from this site did not flow into the State Right -of -Way, then it will not be allowed to flow into the State Right -of -Way at this time. PA -2100077 —Conditions of Approval 8