SU0014470 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN II The second and ea0 subsequent Specific Plan will include an evaluation of actual student generation rates to detefrnine whether revisions need to be made to the School Facilities Master Plans. Lamm ersWle Unihed School Qistrict is to pursue State funding to the maximum extent feasible. Developars in Mountain House will provide full school mitigation that may be decreased by revenues obtained from the State and other sources. Plan Description Figure 3.1: SPII Land Use shows the lacafion of the fm --six new K-8 schools proposed for Specific Plan 11. Table 5.1: SPII K -A Student Generation indicates the projected school populations for each neighb❑rh❑ad. Chapter Four includes irlustrati❑ns of schools as part of Neighboftod Center plans (see Figures 4.21 to 4.25)_ Specific Plan I1 proposes that enma peignb.:?rhood.—Veifihb8rhoed�6- t Velaped as ars ashy+ aduti-am y, aWd•tliat-two neighborhoods, Neighborhoods J and K, he developed as mixed active adult and family nelghborhbods and share one K-8 school_ These changes decrease overall student generation and eliminates the need for two K-€3 schools, resulting in 10 (rather than 12) K-8 schools at Mountain House. Student generation rates were re evaluated as part of this specitic plan, and no changes are proposed as part of this Specific Plan. Actual student generation in Neighborhood F has been lower than protected by the Master Plan_ The District's rates, as adopted by the Master Play, are historic averages that consider declining and increasing trends overtime. For long-term planning, there is no evidence on wNch to revise these student generation rates. Health and safety studies, including current California Department of Education (ODE) standards as found in California Code of Regulations, Ti iv 5, $ections 14001-14036), were evaluated as part of this specific plan (see Chapter Six). The CDE's current power line setbacks are consistent with those used far the Master Plan. New DOE standards call for 1,504 feet setback between schools and railroad easements or pipelines. lite Neigh borhaod H plan has been designed to locate the 16 -acre K-8 school property at least 1,568 feet from the UP line and gas easement. Ttte joint use portion of the Neighborhood Park will fall within the 1,500 -loot setback- SPII Implementation Measures K-8 School Facility Requirements. All applicable implementing projects $half provide full mitigation for K-8 school facilities within Specific Plan II. For land controlled by Tf im Piek C mnH"tiss, LLCthe_Ma&tar Deyellopq , all projects shall comply with applicable previsions of the School Facilities Mitigation Agreement between Lam merswille Unified School District and TrLLCthe Master Devero ar_ _High School Facility Ropulrements. All applicable implementing pro}ects shall provide full mftigatton for high school facilitias within Specific Plan 11. IFor land controlled by -T*martt Oorn:r••"'iiL-9:—, I I the Master Developer, all projects shall comply with applicable provlslons of the School Facilities Mltigation Agreement between TraWLarnmersville Unified School District and Td mad; Corn rnutritie ,LLC th e Master Developer. School t;actltty Placement and Des Inn Criteria. School sites shall be located an adequate distance from transmission tines, hazardous pipelines or other applicable State Depaftntent of Education defined hazards to meat the setback criteria adopted by the California Deparbrment of Education as part of CHAP'FFIR FIVE Resolution Template 01/2017 EDUCATION, CHAD CARL= AND L113WA Y SERVICES PAGE 5.2 Revised 111512a19