Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> Gill Medical Center Project <br /> Timing/Implementation: Prior to Construction <br /> Monitoring/Enforcement: County of San Joaquin Planning/Development Services Division <br /> Impact 4.11-2: The Project could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through <br /> reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous <br /> materials into the environment. <br /> Impact Determination: less than significant with mitigation incorporated <br /> Threshold: Creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment due to upset or accident <br /> conditions. <br /> CaIGEM oversees the drilling, operation, maintenance, and plugging and abandonment of oil, natural gas <br /> and geothermal wells. In their NOP comment letter (Appendix A), CaIGEM indicates that a gas well, <br /> referred to as the "North Stockton Unit A" 1 well (API: 0407700519), exists on the Project site and was <br /> converted to a water well in July of 1962. As shown in Figure 3-7, this well is located in the central portion <br /> of the site within the southwest corner of the Phase 2 Main Hospital building footprint. CaIGEM does not <br /> make any statements in their comment letter relative to the adequacy of abandonment procedures for <br /> this well with respect to current standards. However, according to CaIGEM, significant and dangerous <br /> issues may be associated with development near oil and gas wells. For example, nothing guarantees that <br /> a well abandoned to current standards will not start leaking oil, gas, and/or water in the future. It always <br /> remains a possibility that any well may start to leak oil, gas, and/or water after abandonment, no matter <br /> how thoroughly the well was plugged and abandoned. CaIGEM acknowledges that wells abandoned to <br /> current standards have a lower probability of leaking oil, gas, and/or water in the future, but makes no <br /> guarantees as to the adequacy of the onsite well's abandonment with respect to current standards or the <br /> potential need for future re-abandonment. <br /> In their NOP comment letter, CaIGEM provides the following comments/guidance solely to facilitate <br /> decisions made by the local permitting agency, in conjunction with the property owner and/or developer, <br /> for development near a gas well. <br /> 1. It is recommended that access to a well located on the property be maintained in the event <br /> abandonment of the well becomes necessary in the future. Impeding access to a well could <br /> result in the need to remove any structure or obstacle that prevents or impedes access. This <br /> includes, but is not limited to, buildings, housing, fencing, landscaping, trees,pools,patios, <br /> sidewalks, and decking. <br /> 2. Nothing guarantees that a well abandoned to current standards will not start leaking oil, <br /> gas, and/or water after abandonment, no matter how thoroughly the well was plugged and <br /> abandoned. CaIGEM acknowledges that wells abandoned to current standards have a <br /> lower probability of leaking oil, gas, and/or water in the future, but makes no guarantees as <br /> to the adequacy of this well's abandonment or the potential need for future re- <br /> abandonment. <br /> 3. Based on comment 1 and 2 above, CaIGEM makes the following general recommendations: <br /> a. Maintain physical access to any gas well encountered. <br /> Noise 4.11-7 October 2021 <br />