My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014502
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
11000
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1900240
>
SU0014502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2022 10:29:54 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 4:18:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014502
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1900240
STREET_NUMBER
11000
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95242-
APN
05908029, -07 -30
ENTERED_DATE
11/4/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11000 N WEST LN
RECEIVED_DATE
5/2/2022 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> Gill Medical Center Project <br /> 13. Eight Mile Road&SR 99 East Frontage Road <br /> Under Existing Plus Project conditions, the intersection of Eight Mile Road & SR 99 East Frontage Road <br /> would operate at LOS E with 35.2 seconds of delay during the a.m. peak hour, and at LOS F with 73.7 <br /> seconds of delay during the p.m. peak hour. LOS E and F are considered unacceptable. Compared to <br /> Existing Conditions, the project-related increase in delay would be greater than five seconds during either <br /> the a.m. peak hour or the p.m. peak hour. Therefore, based on criteria presented in the above General <br /> Plan Policy Consistency Criteria section, the project-related inconsistency with General Plan policies is <br /> considered significant.With implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.19-1 d this impact would be reduced <br /> to less than significant with mitigation incorporated. <br /> As shown in Table 4.19-11, implementation of the above recommended improvements would improve <br /> traffic operations to LOS C with 23.9 seconds of delay in the a.m. peak hour and LOS C with 21.0 seconds <br /> of delay in the p.m. peak hour. LOS C is considered acceptable. <br /> Roadway Segment Levels of Service <br /> Table 4.19-12 presents LOS on each study roadway segment under Existing Plus Project conditions. <br /> Traffic volumes under Existing Plus Project conditions would be generally higher than under Existing <br /> Conditions and as a result LOS at seven of the 10 study roadway segments would be at acceptable LOS C <br /> or better. No improvements are needed at these seven roadway segments to achieve acceptable LOS. <br /> The following describes the three study roadway segments that would operate at unacceptable LOS under <br /> Existing Plus Project conditions. <br /> Table 4.19-12.Roadway Segment Level of Service-Existing Plus Project <br /> Roadway Segment Number of Daily Volume Level of Service <br /> Lanes <br /> Eight Mile Road West of Lower Sacramento Road 2 19,869 E <br /> Lower Sacramento Road South of Eight Mile Road 2 16,801 E <br /> Eight Mile Road Lower Sacramento Road to West Lane 2 23,676 F <br /> West Lane North of Eight Mile Road 4 13,474 A <br /> West Lane South of Eight Mile Road 4 17,182 A <br /> Eight Mile Road West Lane to Ham Lane 2 13,981 C <br /> Ham Lane West Lane to Eight Mile Road 2 1,425 A <br /> Eight Mile Road West of Micke Grove Road/Holman Road 2 13,869 C <br /> State Route 99 North of Eight Mile Road 6 79,016 C <br /> State Route 99 Eight Mile Road to Morada Lane 6 80,906 C <br /> Transportation 4.19-34 October 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.