My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014502
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
11000
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1900240
>
SU0014502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2022 10:29:54 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 4:18:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014502
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1900240
STREET_NUMBER
11000
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95242-
APN
05908029, -07 -30
ENTERED_DATE
11/4/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11000 N WEST LN
RECEIVED_DATE
5/2/2022 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
464
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> Gill Medical Center Project <br /> 4.19-1 g: Eliminate Sidewalks Along the Ham Lane Driveway <br /> The applicant shall revise the project site plan to eliminate sidewalks along the Ham Lane <br /> driveway until such time that sidewalks are provided on Ham Lane between Eight Mile <br /> Road and the Ham Lane driveway entrance. Pedestrians should be encouraged to use the <br /> West Lane access route until Ham Lane and the Ham Lane entrance driveway sidewalks <br /> are constructed. <br /> Timing/Implementation: Prior to and during construction <br /> Monitoring/Enforcement.• County of San Joaquin Planning/Development Services Division <br /> Impact 4.19-2: Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) <br /> for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) <br /> Impact Determination:Significant and Unavoidable <br /> Thresholds: Result in inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) <br /> Impact Determination <br /> As noted in the above Vehicle Miles Traveled Significance Threshold section, at the time of Traffic Study <br /> preparation, neither the City of Stockton nor the County of San Joaquin had adopted guidelines for <br /> analyzing VMT for CEQA documents. Therefore, the draft EIR VMT analysis contained in this draft EIR is <br /> intended to be a good-faith effort at disclosing and identifying the VMT impacts of the Project absent city <br /> or county adopted guidance. <br /> As described in more detail in the Vehicle Miles Traveled Significance Threshold section of this traffic <br /> impact study, the impacts of the Project on VMT is evaluated by comparing project-related VMT to a <br /> citywide average, expressed as "VMT per Service Population. To achieve a 15 percent reduction in VMT, <br /> consistent with City of Stockton General Plan Policy Action TRT-4.3, a project is considered to have a <br /> significant impact on VMT if it would generate more than 20.54 VMT per Service Population. <br /> VMT associated with the Project was calculated using the City of Stockton General Plan travel demand <br /> model (City of Stockton 2O18b). Two estimates of VMT were calculated. The two estimates may be <br /> thought of as "gross" and "net". These two estimates are described below: <br /> The estimate of gross VMT associated with the Project was calculated by applying a "select link" <br /> procedure to the General Plan travel demand model. This procedure identified all vehicle trips to <br /> and from the Project site. Project trips were then multiplied by the model-estimated length of <br /> these trips, in miles. The sum of the length of the vehicle trips associated with the Project was <br /> calculated to estimate direct project-related VMT. <br /> The estimate of net VMT associated with the Project was calculated by running the General Plan <br /> travel demand model both with and without the project. VMT for all travel in the model area was <br /> then calculated for both runs of the model. The net change in VMT was calculated by subtracting <br /> the model area VMT total for the run without the project from the model area VMT total with the <br /> project. In the model run without the project, vehicle trips that would otherwise travel to the <br /> Transportation 4.19-40 October 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.