Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report <br /> Gill Medical Center Project <br /> Auburn Indian Community were on the list of tribes to contact. Both of these tribes were offered an <br /> opportunity to consult, as summarized above. <br /> 4.20.4.2 Ethnographic Information <br /> The ethnographic information reviewed for the Project, including ethnographic maps (Levy 1978; Wallace <br /> 1978) lists the nearest Native American village along the Mokelumne River six miles north of the Project <br /> Area, and also indicated that the Northern Valley Yokuts territory of Ja(a(on is directly south of the Project <br /> Area although no villages are mapped in the territory. Ethnographic literature from Barret and Gifford <br /> (1933) indicated that most of the pre-contact habitation sites located along waterways in the San Juaquin <br /> valley were wiped out during land and water reclamation efforts for agricultural endeavors in the <br /> nineteenth century.Although there is nothing in the ethnographic literature that suggests that the Project <br /> location is known to have ethnographic villages or resources within its boundaries, the significant land <br /> and water changes may have obscured or obliterated small unmapped or unrecorded habitation sites. <br /> However, this possibility remains relatively low due to the lack of nearby ethnographic areas mentioned in <br /> the literature. <br /> 4.20.4.3 Archaeological Site Records <br /> The entire Project Area was subjected to an archaeological survey and records search review, and no <br /> Native American sites were identified within its boundaries. In addition, approximately 15 percent of the <br /> area within a 0.5-mile radius surrounding the Project Area has been subject to cultural surveys; no pre- <br /> contact archaeological sites have been previously recorded in the vicinity.A pedestrian survey was <br /> completed for the Project Area (ECORP 2020) and identified only two historic period resources related to <br /> agriculture and ranching. No sites associated with Native American culture were found during the survey. <br /> Additional information about these non-Native American cultural resources can be found in Chapter 4.7 <br /> of this Draft EIR. <br /> 4.20.4.4 Tribal Consultation Results <br /> Buena Vista did not identify any TCRs within the Project Area. However, based on the information <br /> provided by the tribe, there remains a possibility that undiscovered TCRs could become known during <br /> construction. <br /> 4.20.5 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> 4.20.5.1 Thresholds of Significance <br /> Following Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, TCR impacts are considered to be significant if the project <br /> would result in any of the following: <br /> 1. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal <br /> cultural resource, defined in PRC § 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape <br /> that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred <br /> place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: <br /> Tribal Cultural Resources 4.20-7 October 2021 <br />