Laserfiche WebLink
Consolidated Forwar, .le. Landfill Page 4 <br />(FAA) and Stockton Metropolitan Airport to mitigate lighting impacts that could be caused <br />by the proposed project. ( . <br />B. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION <br />3 (B.t) <br />Proposed as Part of the Project: <br />4 (B.2) <br />The County has detennined that the applicant shall contribute their fair <br />share of the signal installation at the intersection of Austin RoadIMariposa <br />Road. A previoUs study (Austin Road Landfill EIR, 1999) identifies a <br />mitigation measure-that included the applicant's contribution to the <br />installation of a traffic signal at Austin RoadIMariposa Road. This is <br />included in existing pemtit requirements and is assumed to occur as part of <br />baseline conditions. <br />Identified in This Em: <br />5 (B.6) <br />The project applicant shall contribute $3,768.84 toward the signal installation at Austin <br />Road! Arch Road. The applicant shall contribute 5-1,696.67 to the signal installation at the <br />intersection of Austin RoadlFrench Camp Road. <br />Identified in This Em: <br />C.NOISE <br />6 (C.3) <br />The applicant shall contribute a fair share to the required addition of a second eastbound-to- <br />southbound left turn lane to Austin Road that would be required to improve intersection <br />operations to acceptable levels. The improvement includes the addition of a second <br />eastbound-to-southbound left turn lane at the intersection of Mariposa Road! Austin Road. <br />With the recommended improvement, the intersection would operate at LOS B with a VIC <br />ratio 0[0.686 during the PM peak hour. <br />Identified in This J!;IR: <br />(a) Heavy equipment operations shall not be conducted within 1500 feet of any occupied <br />residence after 10 p.m. and before 6 a.m.; or . <br />(b) Equipment operations within 1500 feet of any residence after 10 p.m. or before 6 a.m. <br />shall be fully shielded from the direct line of sight to the residence by an earthen bemt whose <br />crown elevation exceeds the elevation ofthe top of the exhaust stack. <br />7 Fonvard 1993 (E3) <br />The landowner and tenant at RI (residence at 9690 Austin Road) shall be provided with the <br />option of requesting a sound wall to reduce noise exposure both in theftont yard and within <br />the home. Table m.E.B in the Draft EIR shows the noise reduction provided by a variety of <br />different sound wall designs. The footnotes to Table llJ.E.B describes the alternative designs <br />in detail}. Note that allY of these designs will be more than sufficient to reduce project noise <br />impacts below a level of signijicance. <br />8 Forward 1993 (E1) <br />( <br />( <br />'-- <br />i