My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1996-2002
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1996-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2025 10:06:31 AM
Creation date
12/28/2021 11:49:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1996-2002
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
6484 N WAVERLY RD LINDEN 95236
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> • Foothill Sanitary Landfill -3— <br /> Module <br /> 3— <br /> Module LF-2-Liner Performance Demonstration <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Liner Performance Demonstration <br /> The County proposes an engineered alternative single composite liner that should be designed to meet or <br /> exceed performance standards of Title 27 as required by the Central Valley Regional Board. The <br /> proposed design includes, from bottom to top, a geosynthetic clay layer(GCL) over a prepared subgrade; <br /> 60-mil HDPE; gravel leachate collection and removal system(LCRS)ranging from 0.75 feet thick above <br /> the HDPE and one-foot thick in areas where leachate collection pipes will be placed in trenches; <br /> geosynthetic filter; and a two-foot operations layer of sand. Additional protection will be provided in <br /> leachate sump areas. <br /> Based on our review,we have determined that there are some areas of concern that must be addressed by <br /> the County prior to our acceptance of the liner performance demonstration report as follows: <br /> Section 1.2 Proposed Liner System <br /> In addition to the containment system presented,the installation of a secondary composite liner system <br /> below the leachate removal sump area, equipped with a monitoring and removal system(LCRS), is <br /> proposed. Please provide more details on the design and operation of this system. Include information <br /> on how the LCRS will be maintained/cleaned out and how it will be tested on an annual basis. <br /> Section 1.3 Liner Performance Modeling Results <br /> The constituents benzene, 1,2-DCA, methylene chloride,MTBE, vinyl chloride, barium and chloride <br /> were selected as modeling parameters because they represent constituents found in the leachate at the <br /> nearby North County landfill. The basis for choosing these constituents was their threat to human health <br /> given the high ratio between the constituent's CA Primary MCL and maximum concentration detected in <br /> leachate. However, other factors should be considered for choosing constituents, including those <br /> constituents found in groundwater at the Foothill landfill, high human toxicity,high contaminant <br /> solubility and transport properties, and whether they are representative of the various chemical groups <br /> associated with municipal solid waste landfills. We recommend that metals also be considered in the <br /> modeling effort as potential pollutants, such as hexavalent chromium and arsenic, due to their solubility <br /> and/or mobility in groundwater. <br /> The Report should include a readable,printed table of historical data from the Foothill Landfill and <br /> North County, as applicable, for the Board to review in support of the chosen COCs. Bold the highest <br /> value of each COC monitored to date. Provide a comparison of the modeled numerical values with <br /> background concentrations or established Water Quality Protection Standards, as applicable, for <br /> inorganic constituents. Organic constituents should be compared to the method detection limit for each <br /> constituent and the water quality objective' relative to the most applicable beneficial uses (i.e., chemical <br /> constituents, toxicity, tastes and odors)2 of groundwater. <br /> 'A Compilation of Water Quality Goals,California Environmental Protection Agency,Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board-Central Valley Region,August 2000,with updates. This document and the latest updates may be found at <br /> www.swrcb.ca. og v/rwgcb5 <br /> 2 Water Quality Control Plan,Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins,Fourth Edition(Basin Plan) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.