Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> • Foothill Sanitary Landfill -3— <br /> Module <br /> 3— <br /> Module LF-2-Liner Performance Demonstration <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Liner Performance Demonstration <br /> The County proposes an engineered alternative single composite liner that should be designed to meet or <br /> exceed performance standards of Title 27 as required by the Central Valley Regional Board. The <br /> proposed design includes, from bottom to top, a geosynthetic clay layer(GCL) over a prepared subgrade; <br /> 60-mil HDPE; gravel leachate collection and removal system(LCRS)ranging from 0.75 feet thick above <br /> the HDPE and one-foot thick in areas where leachate collection pipes will be placed in trenches; <br /> geosynthetic filter; and a two-foot operations layer of sand. Additional protection will be provided in <br /> leachate sump areas. <br /> Based on our review,we have determined that there are some areas of concern that must be addressed by <br /> the County prior to our acceptance of the liner performance demonstration report as follows: <br /> Section 1.2 Proposed Liner System <br /> In addition to the containment system presented,the installation of a secondary composite liner system <br /> below the leachate removal sump area, equipped with a monitoring and removal system(LCRS), is <br /> proposed. Please provide more details on the design and operation of this system. Include information <br /> on how the LCRS will be maintained/cleaned out and how it will be tested on an annual basis. <br /> Section 1.3 Liner Performance Modeling Results <br /> The constituents benzene, 1,2-DCA, methylene chloride,MTBE, vinyl chloride, barium and chloride <br /> were selected as modeling parameters because they represent constituents found in the leachate at the <br /> nearby North County landfill. The basis for choosing these constituents was their threat to human health <br /> given the high ratio between the constituent's CA Primary MCL and maximum concentration detected in <br /> leachate. However, other factors should be considered for choosing constituents, including those <br /> constituents found in groundwater at the Foothill landfill, high human toxicity,high contaminant <br /> solubility and transport properties, and whether they are representative of the various chemical groups <br /> associated with municipal solid waste landfills. We recommend that metals also be considered in the <br /> modeling effort as potential pollutants, such as hexavalent chromium and arsenic, due to their solubility <br /> and/or mobility in groundwater. <br /> The Report should include a readable,printed table of historical data from the Foothill Landfill and <br /> North County, as applicable, for the Board to review in support of the chosen COCs. Bold the highest <br /> value of each COC monitored to date. Provide a comparison of the modeled numerical values with <br /> background concentrations or established Water Quality Protection Standards, as applicable, for <br /> inorganic constituents. Organic constituents should be compared to the method detection limit for each <br /> constituent and the water quality objective' relative to the most applicable beneficial uses (i.e., chemical <br /> constituents, toxicity, tastes and odors)2 of groundwater. <br /> 'A Compilation of Water Quality Goals,California Environmental Protection Agency,Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board-Central Valley Region,August 2000,with updates. This document and the latest updates may be found at <br /> www.swrcb.ca. og v/rwgcb5 <br /> 2 Water Quality Control Plan,Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins,Fourth Edition(Basin Plan) <br />