My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1996-2002
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1996-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2025 10:06:31 AM
Creation date
12/28/2021 11:49:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1996-2002
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
6484 N WAVERLY RD LINDEN 95236
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Foothill Sanitary Landfill -4— <br /> Module <br /> 4_Module LF-2 -Liner Performance Demonstration <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Section 2.5 Groundwater Monitoring System <br /> The Report states that the maximum historical groundwater elevation near proposed Module LF-2 ranges <br /> from 50 to 55 feet mean sea level (MSL). If a larger data set were used based on regional groundwater <br /> elevations prior to land filling at Foothill Landfill, the vadose zone depth would be thinner and a more <br /> conservative value would be computed. Therefore, historic elevation of the groundwater(before the <br /> landfill) should be evaluated and determined if it is possible, the water will rebound to these levels. <br /> Based on the determination the model should be run on the highest anticipated elevation. <br /> Please provide a discussion of any production, irrigation, and/or domestic wells in the vicinity. Include a <br /> map showing all wells within a one-mile radius of the site. Also,provide a discussion on historical <br /> regional high water levels in the Stockton area. This comment is also appropriate for Section 2.6 in <br /> Highest Anticipated Groundwater section. The San Joaquin County Flood Control District offices <br /> should have historical data referencing the highest groundwater elevations recorded. <br /> Section 2.6 Aquifer Characteristics <br /> Groundwater Quality: Based on historical analytical data, and the results reported in the quarterly <br /> groundwater and surface water monitoring reports, it appears that groundwater may be impacted from <br /> land filling activities. Specific VOCs found in the groundwater at Foothill Landfill should be considered <br /> when modeling leakage through the proposed single-composite liner system as mentioned above. <br /> Section 3.1 Liner System Properties Overview <br /> Paragraph 4 states the Geomembranes are essentially impermeable and can contain gases. Please <br /> provide documentation/information supporting this statement. <br /> Section 3.2 Module 4 of NCSL—Liner System Design Basis <br /> The Report states that the leachate drainage layer can also be utilized to remove gas pressure over the <br /> landfill liner if such action is needed for gas control. In order to meet the minimum requirement that the <br /> liner prevents migration of pollutants to groundwater, the County should incorporate a landfill gas <br /> collection system into the design of Module LF-2. Additional comments on this issue are addressed in <br /> this letter. <br /> The leachate collection and removal system will include a granular drainage layer over liner base areas <br /> and a geocomposite drainage layer on liner side slopes. Please provide the details of the type of granular <br /> drainage layer particle size and angularity. Describe the specific design of the geocomposite drainage <br /> layer proposed for the side-slopes and whether there would be any slope stability issues for Module LF- <br /> 2. <br /> Section 3.4 State-of-Practice Construction Quality Assurance <br /> Please provide details of what type of leak detection survey/testing protocols are proposed for the HDPE <br /> liner component of the system. We highly recommend the electrical leak detection survey be used to <br /> support the performance standard of the construction of the alternative liner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.