Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Trinkle said that if the entire section were to be developed, that <br />would make a public water system feasible; however, it is not feasible <br />for 13 homes. <br />Mr. Curran commented that many people will be coming to this area from <br />the Bay Area and they will have high expectations on water. Buyers of <br />the lots who will be living there have to have their interests <br />considered. <br />Mr. Trinkle commented on drainage in the area. He said that the <br />drainage is exceptionally fine. <br />Mr. Gau noted that he did not believe that Banta-Carbona. Irrigation <br />District would approve terminal drainage to their facility. <br />There was continued discussion about the wells. In answer to a <br />question, Mr. Trinkle said that wells in the area are drilled to a 206 <br />foot depth with a solid casing and sealed to 100 feet. <br />Dave Olmstead, 7549 Linne Road, Tracy, said he is not the applicant <br />but he has a proposed subdivision about 1/4 mile from this particular <br />project which will be before the Planning Commission some time in the <br />future. He said that any of the conditions placed on this subdivision <br />could affect his project. Regarding water, he said that if they went <br />to a public water system, they would be allowed 100 parts per billion <br />(ppb) of chloroform. If they went to a private water system, they <br />would be allowed 0.19 ppb. He said the aquifers are drawing at about <br />200' on the individual wells as well as, possibly, the public wells. <br />He said he understood that 100 ppb is not a health hazard. <br />Mr. Olmstead said that any large public water system uses chlorine <br />for purifying the water. This produces chloroform. A public water <br />system will not protect the people any more than would individual <br />wells. He asked that the Commission recommend rewording of <br />Recommended Conditions Nos. 2(d) and 3(c). This would allow indivi- <br />dual wells and provide that the contaminant level on the individual <br />wells meet Title 22; and that the chloroform level in those wells not <br />exceed 100 ppb. <br />Mr. Olmstead went on to say that it would not be economically feasible <br />to put a public water system in that area. He also said that the area <br />has outstanding drainage. He said he did not think that the size of <br />the required drainage pond is excessive. He said that Condition 3(c) <br />should be modified to the wording of Board Order 76-4201. <br />He said that his suggested wording on Condition Nos. 2(d) and 3(c) is <br />as follows: Individual wells are acceptable providing that the con- <br />taminant level of the constituents does not exceed Title 22, and that <br />the chloroform does not exceed 100 ppb. The test well would be tested <br />before the subdivision is commenced. It would not be monitored after <br />the subdivision is put in. In answer to a question as to what would <br />happen if Title 22 could not be met, Mr. Olmstead said that a system <br />can be put in for purifying the cold water within the house. <br />PC: 9/10/87 -3- MINUTES <br />