My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014573 (3)
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-86-10
>
SU0014573 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:59:10 PM
Creation date
1/4/2022 9:54:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014573
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-86-10
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
COLLIERVILLE
APN
00316001
ENTERED_DATE
12/8/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
HWY 99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\jcastaneda
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item No . <br /> PC: 12-4-86 <br /> SU-86-10 <br /> Page 5 <br /> subdivision " . . .will seriously disrupt the riparian area. " A <br /> conflict arises in that Public Works and the Army Corps of <br /> Engineers have classified the slough as a terminal drain. <br /> This conflict is further complicated by the fact that the <br /> slough empties into Jahant Lake, which is described as a <br /> valuable, undisturbed, natural riparian environment . <br /> Potential flood hazards from the slough should also be <br /> addressed. <br /> Fish and Game has also indicated that they were dissatisfied <br /> with the lack of County response to their comments on the <br /> earlier EIR. <br /> County General Plan: <br /> Several noise and aviation policies are in conflict with this <br /> project as proposed. <br /> Other Issues: <br /> Tree retention - How many and where? <br /> Fire - Need to identify site acreage/location as requested <br /> by the Fire District . <br /> Schools - Boundary adjustments need to be made so that the <br /> entire subdivision is under a single school district . <br /> 6. The appellant states that the landowners were induced to par- <br /> ticipate in certain street improvements, as those streets <br /> make up the design of the prior tentative subdivision map. <br /> Expenditures of this type are typical of subdivision pro- <br /> jects, and improvements to Woodson Road were all part of the <br /> process in satisfying conditions of approval applied to <br /> S-81-10. These type of improvements are typical of sub- <br /> division projects and are not unusual . <br /> In summary, enough concerns and questions have been raised and <br /> new impacts identified that warrant the need for a "subsequent" <br /> EIR. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.