Laserfiche WebLink
s Z 0<5 <br /> THE SUBJECT PROJECT WAS REFERED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY <br /> STAFF TO DETERMINE THE METHOD FOR HANDLING THE INCREASE STORM <br /> RUNOFF DUE TO CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSES ON THE PROPOSED 5-ACRE <br /> RANCHETTES. PUBLIC WORKS OFFERED DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS FOR THE <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER. <br /> AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON NOVEMBER 5 , 1992 , <br /> COMMISSIONER GILLESPIE MADE THE MOTION THAT HE COULD NOT <br /> SUPPORT THE PROPOSED PROJECT BECAUSE OF THE "DOUBLE FLAG <br /> LOT ACCESS" . THERE IS NO DOUBLE FLAG LOT SITUATION WITHIN THE <br /> PROJECT OR NEAR THE PROJECT. BOTH PROPOSED LOTS WILL <br /> BE SERVED BY THE SAME ACCESS FROM JAHANT ROAD. THIS EXISTING <br /> 25-FOOT WIDE GRAVELED ROAD STRIP IS OWNED BY THE APPLICANT <br /> AND WILL SERVE ONLY THE TWO PROPOSED LOTS. THE LENGTH OF THE <br /> EXISTING ROAD IS 660 FEET AND IS PROPOSED TO BE LENGTHENED TO <br /> A TOTAL OF 1005 FEET. <br /> THE COUNTY ORDINANCE ALLOWS A MAXIMUM LENGTH FOR PRIVATE <br /> ROADS OF 1 /2 MILE AND UP TO 6 HOMESITES. THE PROPOSAL IS WELL <br /> WITHIN THIS ORDINANCE. <br /> AT THE SAME MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THE HAM MINOR <br /> SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED WHERE THE PROPOSED PRIVATE ROAD WILL <br /> SERVE 4 LOTS AND THE LENGTH WILL BE ABOUT 2000 FEET. <br /> THIS INCONSISTENCY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE ONE <br /> PROJECT AND DENIAL THE NEXT PROJECT THAT HAS LESS IMPACTS IS <br /> INCREDIBLE . <br /> THERE WERE NO REASONS TO DENY THE PROJECT . IT IS CONSISTANT <br /> WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING AND COUNTY ORDINANCES. THE <br /> PROPOSED PROJECT IS THE SAME AS MANY OTHER APPROVED PROJECTS <br /> IN THE COUNTY. NO SPECIAL CONSIDERATION IS REQUIRED OR <br /> NEEDED. <br /> -2- <br />