My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0084717_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
285
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0084717_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 12:18:44 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 9:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0084717
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
285 S AUSTIN RD
STREET_NUMBER
285
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22802048
ENTERED_DATE
1/12/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
285 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1028
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
california Water Today 89 <br />Figure 2.8 <br />Total gross agricultural and urban water use has been decreasing <br />sOURcE: Authors’ calculations using data from California Water Plan Update (california department of Water Resources, various years). <br />NOTEs: The figure shows gross water use. Urban includes residential and nonagricultural business uses. Pre-2000 estimates are <br />adjusted to levels that would have been used in a year of normal rainfall. Estimates for 2000 and 2005 are for actual use; both <br />years had near-normal precipitation. Estimates omit conveyance losses, which account for 6 percent to 9 percent of the total. <br />of drought.) Although California’s population has continued to grow rapidly, water <br />conservation activities and changes in economic structure (notably, less water- <br />consuming manufacturing) have reduced per capita urban water use enough since <br />the mid-1990s to keep total gross urban water use roughly constant (Figure 2.9). <br />Gross agricultural water use appears to have been falling since the early <br />1980s, due to irrigation efficiency improvements and retirement of some farm- <br />land with urbanization and accumulating soil salinity.10 Despite these declines <br />in farm water use, crop production and the value of farm output continue to <br />rise owing to productivity improvements and shifts to higher-value crops. Over <br />the last four decades, yields have risen at an average rate of 1.42 percent per year <br />as both crop varieties and farming practices have improved (Brunke, Howitt, <br />and Sumner 2005). As farmers have shifted to higher-value horticultural and <br />orchard crops, they have adopted more efficient drip and sprinkler irrigation <br />technologies and management practices.11 Together, rising yields and a shift to <br />10. Irrigated crop acreage (which counts acreage more than once if it is farmed more than once during the year) fell from <br />a high of nearly 10 million acres in 1980 to roughly 9.2 million acres in the mid-2000s. Irrigated land area (which counts <br />acreage only once) fell from 9.6 to 8.8 million acres (authors’ calculations using data from the California Department <br />of Water Resources). <br />11. Orang, Matyac, and Snyder (2008) report that surface irrigation decreased by about 30 percent from 1972 to 2001 <br />and drip/microsystem increased by about 31 percent, mostly from reduced field crop and increased orchard and vineyard <br />planting. Most of the switch occurred from the early 1990s onward. <br />Agriculture <br />Total <br />Urban <br />20001995199019851980197219671960 2005 <br />40 <br />35 <br />30 <br />25 <br />20 <br />15 <br />10 <br />5 <br />45 <br />0Gross water use (maf)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.