My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0084717_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
285
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0084717_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 12:18:44 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 9:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0084717
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
285 S AUSTIN RD
STREET_NUMBER
285
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22802048
ENTERED_DATE
1/12/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
285 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1028
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
90 Part i california Water <br />Figure 2.9 <br />Gross per capita urban water use is now declining <br />sOURcE: Authors’ calculations using data from California Water Plan Update (california department of Water Resources, various years). <br />NOTEs: Water use is shown in gallons per capita per day (gpcd). Outdoor water use is much higher in inland areas because of <br />hotter temperatures and larger lot sizes (hanak and davis 2006). The low-desert colorado River region, including areas such as <br />Palm springs, has especially high per capita use from golf-based tourism. <br />higher-value crops have considerably increased the real dollar value per acre- <br />foot of irrigation water.12 <br />Although comparable trends in environmental water allocations are not <br />available, it is likely that new environmental water dedications play some role <br />in the tightening of overall supplies available for agricultural and urban use in <br />recent decades.13 During this time, California’s population and economy have <br />both increased, reflecting a substantial decoupling of economic prosperity from <br />the availability of abundant water supplies. Having more water is no longer as <br />fundamentally important as when California’s economy was based largely on <br />irrigated agriculture or mining. <br />The declining trends in gross agricultural and urban water use may have <br />accelerated in the late 2000s, as a multiyear drought and new restrictions on <br />12. From 1972 to 1995, the real economic value of output per acre-foot of applied irrigation water increased by <br />19.3 percent when using the Gross Domestic Product deflator to measure inflation, and by 92.6 percent when deflated <br />using U.S. Department of Agriculture index of prices received by farmers (Brunke, Howitt, and Sumner 2005). <br />13. For example, since 1993, the federal Central Valley Project Improvement Act has restricted supplies to some <br />agricultural contractors south of the Delta (Chapter 2). Overall pumping through the Delta continued to increase <br />during the late 1990s and early 2000 as State Water Project contractors increased their draw (Figure 2.4), but much of <br />the additional water went to storage for dry years in groundwater banks and Metropolitan Water District of Southern <br />California’s new surface reservoir, Diamond Valley Lake. Since the 1990s, Los Angeles has cut its diversions from the <br />Mono Lake and Owens Valley region in response to environmental rulings. <br />Inland <br />Inland <br />(without the <br />Colorado River) <br />California <br />Coastal <br />Gross water use (gpcd)20001995199019851980197219671960 2005 <br />350 <br />300 <br />250 <br />200 <br />150 <br />400 <br />100
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.