My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0084717_SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
285
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0084717_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2022 12:18:44 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 9:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0084717
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
285 S AUSTIN RD
STREET_NUMBER
285
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22802048
ENTERED_DATE
1/12/2022 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
285 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1028
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
california Water Today 123 <br />California even higher, at $5 billion.) For water, these levels of spending reflect <br />increases in real per capita spending since the early 1980s, and for wastewater, <br />a relatively stable rate of spending since the mid-1970s (Figure 2.15). <br />Although utilities have benefited from state bond funding as well as some <br />property tax receipts, utility revenue comes predominately from ratepayers.56 <br />Compared with their own estimates of needs, water and wastewater utili- <br />ties generally appear to have sufficient flexibility to raise rates to fund capital <br />improvements in their systems, although they now face greater procedural <br />requirements arising from Propositions 218. Moreover, water and wastewater <br />rates in California generally fall well within the range considered “affordable” <br />by federal guidelines (less than 4 percent of household income) (Table 2.4).57 <br />Although raising rates is never easy politically, the ability to raise rates, while <br />Figure 2.15 <br />Real per capita investments have been rising for water and holding <br />steady for wastewater <br />sOURcEs: census of Governments; de Alth and Rueben (2005). <br />NOTE: Nominal values were converted to 2008 dollars using the Engineering News Record construc- <br />tion cost index. <br />56. In 2007, grants and equity contributions from federal and state sources accounted for less than 2 percent of revenues <br />and contributed capital for all publicly owned local and regional urban and agricultural water agencies and wastewater <br />utilities. Property taxes accounted for 5 percent of urban and agricultural water district revenues and 8 percent of waste- <br />water district revenues; and voter-approved assessments accounted for 6 percent and 2 percent of revenues, respectively <br />(comparable information on the share of tax revenues is not available for city-owned utilities) (authors’ calculations <br />using data from the State Controller’s Office files). <br />57. See Hanak and Barbour (2005) for a discussion of affordability guidelines. <br />Wastewater <br />Water <br />100 <br />Per capita capital outlays (2008 $)19921977197219671957 200219621987 19971982 2007 <br />120 <br />80 <br />60 <br />40 <br />20 <br />140 <br />0
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.