Laserfiche WebLink
california Water Today 133 <br />Strengths and Weaknesses in Today’s Water System <br />California’s water system today has both impressive assets and significant <br />vulnerabilities. A major asset is the sophisticated physical infrastructure that <br />enables water to be delivered to urban and agricultural demand centers and <br />successfully protects residents from frequent floods. Vulnerabilities in this <br />infrastructure—which threaten water supplies and increase flood risk—include <br />a fragile water supply conveyance hub in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, <br />deteriorating flood control structures, chronic overdraft in some major ground- <br />water basins, and increasing problems of water salinity and other contaminants. <br />Another major asset is the resilience of California’s economy, which has <br />shown an ability to adapt and continue to grow, despite increasing water scar- <br />city. Continued adaptation seems possible, with suitable management and <br />policy changes, given the economy’s decreasing reliance on water as a direct <br />input into production, the sizable proportion of agricultural water still allocated <br />to low-value crops, and the large share of urban water now used for landscape <br />irrigation. However, economic adaptation potential is limited by regional eco- <br />nomic concerns (which can make agricultural communities reluctant to sell or <br />divert water from lower-value crops) and difficulties of reducing outdoor water <br />use by millions of California households and businesses. <br />For all their complexity, California’s diverse water management institutions <br />also have some strong positive features that can serve the state well in confront- <br />ing the challenges it faces. The state has many dedicated, highly trained staff <br />working on all aspects of its water system, and their decentralized governance <br />means that water managers are quite responsive to local water user needs. <br />However, this system will fail to satisfy the broader needs of the economy and <br />the environment without better coordination that aligns management oversight <br />with the appropriate geographical scale (e.g., basins and watersheds) and that <br />connects activities across different functional areas to benefit water supply, flood <br />protection, water quality, and ecosystems. Similar challenges of coordination <br />exist among state and federal agencies, which also face resource constraints <br />and limits on their authority. Inadequate technical information and scientific <br />capacity is a particular weakness in California’s current institutional landscape. <br />Decentralization, fragmentation, and limited resources to collect and analyze <br />information on water use and to support solution-oriented science by major <br />state and federal agencies have hobbled the state’s ability to address the major