SU0014635 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A letter from Dave Pechan was read into the record; the letter is attached to Mr. Vacco's appeal. The Planning Commission, in making their decision, found that the division of the 12.24 -acre flag lot parcel into seven rural resi- dential lots will have access via Fine Road from the west through a proposed public road (Vacco Road). In addition, each lot in the subdivision will be served by individual wells and septic tanks, and a terminal drainage system will convey storm drainage to the Fine Road drainage system. The Commission found the proposed sub- division consistent with the laws and policies of the County. Mr. Vacco based his appeal on the following two points: (1) The primary access to the subdivision will be over property owned by Mr. Vacco. Additionally, Mr. Vacco is concerned over the potential that the County will condemn the property for road purposes if he refuses to sell. (2) The Planning Commission rejected a project condition for a landscaping buffer between Mr. Vacco's property and the project site. Mr. Vacco's appeal issues were considered by the Planning Commission. The Commission did approve the application subject to the proposed road (Mr. Vacco's property) being acquired, improved, and dedicated to the County. The Commission did not, and could not, commit the County to acquiring the roadway but did indicate that the applicant could request that the County become involved in acquisition if the applicant was unable to purchase the property. The landscape request by Mr. Vacco was not discussed by the Commission, and no condition of approval was suggested. The Commission apparently did not feel that the request for landscaping was merited. FISCAL IMPACT: None ACTION TO BE TAKEN FOLLOWING APPROVAL: None Sincerely, CHET DAVISSON DIRECTOR CD: JVB:blm Enc: Appeal, Minutes, Staff Report c: Linda Lindberg Howard Seligman Chance Wong Peter Vacco RnS T.PTTRP PAGE 2