My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014635
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FINE
>
950
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-87-24
>
SU0014635
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2022 8:42:17 AM
Creation date
1/18/2022 11:53:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014635
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
SU-87-24
STREET_NUMBER
950
STREET_NAME
FINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
APN
09304009
ENTERED_DATE
12/13/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
950 FINE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\jcastaneda
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in the New Petersburg project. He noted the flooding of his property <br />last year. He said this is a very bad area for flooding. The water <br />stays on top of the soil. <br />June Connors, 998 Fine Road, Linden, asked about maintenance of the <br />drainage ditch. She said she would not want the water to back up onto <br />her property. <br />Mr. Lopez, representing Public Works, said that the roadside ditch <br />along Fine Road is maintained by the County. <br />Alan Victor, Third Avenue, asked about maintenance of ditches along <br />Vacco Road. <br />A letter from Dave Pechan was submitted by staff. <br />REBUTTAL: Mr. Seligman said there must be proper drainage; and they <br />are concerned about that problem without any development. He said the <br />County had not come out to the area to clean out the ditches for a <br />long period of time. It was at the insistence of Mrs. Lindberg that <br />the County did come out to help alleviate the problem. He said the <br />identity of Vacco Road was not their decision. Regarding Mr. Vacco's <br />request for a buffer, Mr. Seligman said his client is also concerned <br />about privacy. Regarding access, he said the public safety standards <br />would have to be implemented in regard to access. <br />Clair Vacco asked that she be noted as being present. <br />Comm. Bozzano said he had a telephone conversation with Mr. or Mrs. <br />Lindberg prior to this hearing. <br />PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED <br />Comm. Morri asked for clarification of some points made in the letters <br />from County Counsel and Public Works. <br />Mr. Lopez, representing Public Works, said that "facilities" refers to <br />a roadside ditch. As to payment of fees, he said there would probably <br />be an administration fee rather than a maintenance fee since the main- <br />tenance is already being performed. He said there are no facilities <br />to be maintained by a County Service Area. <br />Comm. Bozzano asked Comm. Gillispie to comment on the right-of-way <br />question. Comm. Gillispie said the right-of-way is a peculiar <br />situation. If the right-of-way had been required on the three lots, <br />it would have solved a major portion of the problem. He said it might <br />be possible to go through condemnation across the north. <br />Mr. Bruno, Deputy County Counsel, explained condemnation procedures. <br />MOTION: Moved, seconded (Carter -Gabbard) and carried by a majority <br />roll call vote to: <br />PC: 7/16/87 - 6 - MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.