Laserfiche WebLink
Wainui: Girovci €;ewer Prajeci: 15oo:�C<-�r huuga Si<aEinn Vrcie ;s <br />Our Project: Numhar: LFf-D1F:l. <br />lay 14, 2007 <br />shallow test hole was drilled with a truck mounted Mobile B53 drill rig, utilizing 6 -inch <br />continuous flight auger. The deeper boring was drilled with a truck mounted Mobile <br />B53 drill rig utilizing the mud rotary drilling method. The locations of the test holes are <br />shown on the Location Map, Plate No. 1. The locations of the test holes were <br />determined by pacing from existing site features; hence, accuracy can be implied only <br />tD the degree that this method warrants. <br />Sampling of the drilled test holes was performed at various depths using a California <br />Modified 2.5 inch o.d. split spoon sampler with stainless steel tube liners or an unlined <br />Standard Penetration Sampler. The samplers were driven by a 140 pound hammer with <br />a 30 -inch drop. Blow counts required to drive the samplers every 6 inches for a total of <br />18 inches were recorded. The blow counts for the drilled test holes were corrected <br />from an energy efficiency of approximately 45 percent to a standard cat head efficiency <br />of approximately 60 percent. <br />Soil samples obtained <br />from the test Doles were preserved <br />in stainless <br />steel tubes or <br />sealed plastic bags until the samples could be tested in the <br />laboratory. <br />Samples were <br />taken to the laboratory <br />of Neil O. Anderson & Associates, Inc., Lodi, California and used <br />for performing various <br />laboratory tests. Tests performed <br />consisted of unit weights, <br />moisture contents, unconfined compressive strength, Atterberg Limits, <br />and gradation <br />analysis. A summary <br />of the test results are presented on <br />the Log of <br />Boring sheets, <br />Plates <br />2 and <br />3. <br />Visual classification of each soil stratum encountered according to ASTM D2488 (Visual <br />— Manual Procedure) was made in the field by a representative from our office at the <br />time the test holes were drilled. The samples obtained were checked in the laboratory <br />by a geotechnical engineer and classification verified according to ASM D2487. A <br />classification and graphical representation of each soil encountered is presented on the <br />Log of Boring sheets. The test boring legend is presented on Plate No. 4. <br />The soils encountered during .our field <br />investigation were fairly uniform between test <br />holes. The upper soils consisted of silty sand that extended to depths of between 2�/z <br />and 5 feet below the existing ground surface. The soils encountered below the surface <br />soils consisted of stiff to hard sandy and silty clay that extended to depths of between <br />10 and 19 feet below the existing ground surface. In boring B1, the clay was underlain <br />by mediuim stiff to stiff sandy silt, In boring B2, the clay was underlain by medium <br />dense sand that extended to the maximum depth explored. For a more detailed <br />description of the soils encountered in the test holes see the Logs of Boring sheets. <br />NEIL O. .ANDERSON <br />AND ASSOCIATES <br />702/nrdix0 ial 1('ay• l.adi, e'A 95210 <br />)2007 Nett 0. Anderson & Associctes. nc. <br />