My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2007-2012
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MACARTHUR
>
30703
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0505006
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2007-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2022 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
2/23/2022 1:31:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2007-2012
RECORD_ID
PR0505006
PE
4445
FACILITY_ID
FA0006475
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY MATERIAL RECOVERY/TRANSF
STREET_NUMBER
30703
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MACARTHUR
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25313019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
30703 S MACARTHUR DR
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Evan Edgar <br />From: Robert McClellon. Program Coordinator <br />Date: 7/22/2010 <br />Re: Tracy Material Recovery & Transfer Facility Expansion. <br />Submittal of Odor and Noise Information to the LEA <br />Noise study: <br />1. The Noise Study conducted as part of the EIR in 1993 did not study actual site <br />conditions. The study included information from other facilities that were similar and <br />extrapolated the information to reach a conclusion regarding noise from site operations. <br />The main reason for this was because the facility did not exist. A noise study needs to be <br />conducted to study actual site conditions. <br />2. Based on EIR noise levels were measured only at three locations (see EIR, 1993, p.76, <br />Table 4.6.3) at the north and west of the facility. <br />Noise monitoring should include locations in all directions of the facility consider <br />proposed expansion and relocation of the mixed C&D Processing facility to the south of <br />the MRF. <br />3. The proposed project includes increased hours of operation, facility outdoor activity, <br />and increased traffic and tonnage that should also be considered in the noise analysis. <br />It also concluded that that operations under the proposed project during the hours <br />between 6 am and 7 am, and between l Opm and 10:30pm fall into the category of <br />nighttime hours for San Joaquin County General Plan. <br />Only the Lonestar Aggregate Plan in Sacramento and the Noise Element from the County <br />of Sacramento General Plan has been used to consider 80dB Ldn conditionally acceptable <br />for agricultural and industrial lands (see EIR for San Joaquin County General Plan). <br />Minimize noise impacts on neighboring noise sensitive areas. <br />4. The existing noise study did not address any activities inside the Transfer Station/ <br />Material Recovery Facility (TS/MRF) because it is fully enclosed. The TS/MRF often <br />times operates with the doors open. Even if the doors are maintained closed during the <br />nighttime hours there will be some site equipment that will be used (forklifts and loaders) <br />to move the processed recyclables in and out. The forklifts and loader are equipped with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.