Laserfiche WebLink
The results of this analysis indicate that the kinetic in the discharge permit, the mass of pollutant dis- <br /> relationships for BOD and TSS removal are valid for charged will be smaller than in conventional waste- <br /> overland flow systems receiving primary or raw waste- water treatment systems. As explained earlier, less <br /> water only. The lowest applied concentration of BOD wastewater is discharged from overland flow systems <br /> and TSS where these relationships hold is estimated than is applied. <br /> to be 45 mg L-'. Different kinetic relationships need The fraction of wastewater that reaches the runoff <br /> to be developed for overland flow systems receiving collection ditch can be estimated from local evapo- <br /> pond effluent. transpiration and percolation rates. Typically, the <br /> runoff fraction will range from 0.6 to 0.9 depending <br /> on Iotal climatic conditions and soil characteristics. <br /> DESIGN PROCEDURE The detention time used for design should be the <br /> longest time determined from Figures 6, 8,and 9. <br /> The primary purpose of the proposed design For equal removal percentages, the controlling design <br />' procedure is to properly size the overland flow sys- parameter is ammonia removal followed by BOD <br />'i tem so that it meets the quality requirements of the and TSS removal. For example, if 90016 ammonia, <br /> discharge permit. The three basic steps in this pro- BOD and TSS removal is required, the detention <br /> cedure are times needed are 68,57 and 40 minutes respectively: <br /> j 1. Determine the detention times required to In this case, the design should be based on ammonia <br /> remove pollutants specified in the discharge removal since it requires the longest detention time. <br /> permit. However, in most cases ammonia removal is not re- <br /> 2. Calculate the application rate needed to quired and BOD removal will be the controlling de- <br /> satisfy the longest or most critical detention sign parameter. <br /> time. <br /> 3. Calculate the land area required from the Step 2: Calculate the application rate <br /> application rate and system design flow. The annual application rate which will satisfy the <br /> detention time requirements determined in Step 1 <br /> ( Step 1: Determine the detention time can be calculated as follows: <br /> j The detention time required to achieve the de- <br /> sired removal of BOD,TSS and NH3-Ncan be de- Q =9- y (15) <br /> termined from Figures 6, 8,and 9. The phosphorus ' r <br /> { removal vs detention time relationship shown in <br /> Figure 10 is not used in this procedure because over- where Q.=annual application rate, m' yr' m' <br /> land flow is not considered to be an efficient process r=overland flow coefficient <br /> for removing this pollutant. As noted earlier, phos- 1'= operating time,hr yr r. <br /> phorus removal can be improved by chemical pre- <br /> cipitation with alum. The average overland flow rate q can be calculated <br /> To use Figures 6,8,and 9, the percentage removal by rearranging eq 13 so that <br /> of BOD,TSS and NH3-N must be calculated on a <br /> mass basis. Information needed for this calculation0.078 L 0.2 <br /> includes the design flow,an estimate of the applied q_S113 jr where q <S1 1313 (16 <br /> wastewater concentrations, desired runoff concen- <br /> trations and the runoff fraction. The values for L and S are selected by the designer <br /> Concentrations of BOD,TSS and NH3-N in the based on the topography of the potential site. Natural <br /> applied wastewater will depend on the degree of pre- terrain contours should be used to the maximum ex. <br /> treatment. In most cases it is advisable to use less tent possible to minimize cut and fill operations. <br /> pretreatment in order to reduce costs and take ad- However,careful surface preparation will still be <br /> vantage of the excellent treatment capabilities of, needed to ensure even flow distribution. <br /> overland flow. If the design includes a storage pond, The upper limit on q in eq 16 is necessary to <br /> the diluting effect of this effluent when mixed with avoid a situation where the application rate is so <br /> primary or raw wastewater should also be considered. high that it causes scouring. Typically this could <br /> The desired runoff concentrations can be deter- occur when a design calls for a short detention time <br /> mined from the discharge permit. It should be noted on a long terrace. The limitation placed on q was <br /> that by satisfying the concentration limits specified based on calculations of the scour velocity shown in <br /> Appendix C. <br /> 14 <br />