Laserfiche WebLink
GROUND WATER IN THE CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A15 <br /> TABLE 2.—Specific-storage values (Sd for aquifers in the Central Valley <br /> Specific storage <br /> coefficient <br /> Source of data (per foot) Remarks <br /> Fine Coarse <br /> grained grained <br /> Elastic <br /> Poland — 1.4 x 10-6 Assumed 1,000 ft of <br /> (1961, p. 1353) aquifer thickness <br /> of which 700 ft is <br /> coarse and 300 ft <br /> is fine. Estimate is <br /> for coarse material <br /> only. <br /> Riley and — 0.7 to 1 x 10--6 Detailed leaky-aqui- <br /> McClelland fer analysis of <br /> (1972, p. 77) pumping tests near <br /> Fresno, San Joa- <br /> quin Valley. <br /> Helm 4.5 x 10- — Average of several <br /> (1978, p. 193)) model runs. <br /> Inelastic <br /> Poland 2 x 10-4 — For 300 ft of clay <br /> (1961, p. 1353) with inelastic stor- <br /> age coefficient of <br /> 5 x 10-2. <br /> Helm 3 x 10-4 — Average for seven <br /> (1978, p. 193) sites;range, <br /> 1.4x10-' to <br /> 6.7 x 10-4. <br /> samples. However, the average Kh of the entire Central that are present in the aquifer system. Different view- <br /> Valley aquifer system is estimated to be 6 ft/d based on points on the role of the fine-grained lenses have resulted <br /> calibration of a regional ground-water flow model in two concepts of the aquifer system, as follows: <br /> (Williamson and others, 1989). This value is somewhat <br /> less than the average value for sand but probably reflects 1. Until recently, most investigators considered the <br /> the lateral discontinuity of sand beds and more accurately Sacramento Valley as containing one unconfined <br /> represents the conductivity that controls ground-water aquifer (Bloyd, 1978) and the San Joaquin Valley as <br /> flow on a regional scale. The average hydraulic conduc- containing two aquifers separated by a regional <br /> tivity of the Sacramento Valley is about one-half the confining unit. The San Joaquin sequence was de- <br /> average for the San Joaquin Valley, probably because of scribed in descending order by Poland and Lofgren <br /> more fine-grained volcanic-derived sediments in the (1984) as a semiconfined aquifer (upper water-bear- <br /> Sacramento Valley (Williamson and others, 1989). ing zone), a regional confining unit (Corcoran Clay <br /> Member of the Tulare Formation), and a confined <br /> aquifer (lower water-bearing zone). <br /> GROUND-WATER FLOW SYSTEM 2. More recently, Williamson and others (1989) pro- <br /> posed the concept of a single heterogeneous aquifer <br /> REGIONAL FLOW system for the Central Valley. This concept is that <br /> "the entire thickness of continental deposits is one <br /> Regional ground-water flow in the Central Valley is aquifer system that has varying vertical leakance and <br /> strongly influenced by the numerous clay and silt lenses confinement depending upon the properties of fine- <br />