Laserfiche WebLink
Alb REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS—CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA <br /> grained sediments." Below the upper few hundred differences result from very heavy pumpage in the lower <br /> feet everywhere, they consider the aquifer to be zone combined with the resistance to vertical flow <br /> virtually confined. These two concepts of the aquifer provided by the fine-grained lenses in the aquifer system. <br /> system in the Central Valley are shown in figure 10. Although some head difference in wells is observed <br /> across the Corcoran Clay Member, an even greater head <br /> Lithologic studies described in chapter C (Page, 1986) difference occurs in wells that tap the intervals above and <br /> show that the aquifer system contains many isolated below the Corcoran. In addition, numerous wells that <br /> lenses of sand, silt, and clay. The fine-grained lenses, contain perforated sections both above and below the <br /> although limited in lateral extent, constitute more than Corcoran Clay Member show little vertical head differ- <br /> 50 percent of the system and have an aggregate thickness ence. Thus, the Corcoran is much less important than the <br /> of as much as several thousand feet. In contrast, the combined effect of the many fine-grained lenses in <br /> Corcoran Clay Member, a confining unit, ranges in controlling vertical flow. In summary, the concept of a <br /> thickness from zero to 160 ft and has an average thickness single heterogeneous aquifer system is supported by the <br /> of 55 ft (Williamson and others, 1989). Vertical head presence of numerous fine-grained lenses and the hy- <br /> differences are present nearly everywhere in the Central draulic response of the system to pumping. <br /> Valley. Head differences, as much as 400 ft, were The concept of a single,mostly confined,heterogeneous <br /> observed in wells of different depths in some areas on the aquifer system was used as the basis for the computer <br /> west side of the San Joaquin Valley. These large head simulation of regional ground-water flow described in <br /> WEST EAST WEST EAST <br /> 7. <br /> ° Unconfined to semi confined aquifer <br /> ° . • upper water-bearing zone) <br /> Unconfined aquifer I ° <br /> Principal confining unit <br /> (Corcoran Clay Member °Eastern limit of confined aquifer <br /> • of the Tulare Formation) <br /> SACRAMENTO VALLEY SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY <br /> A <br /> WEST EAST <br /> 0 <br /> ° . •.. o: <br /> ° e <br /> Numerous overlapping, <br /> discontinuous clay beds <br /> . .. •. . .Qom: <br /> B <br /> FIGURE 10.—Concepts of Central Valley aquifer system. A, Concept of aquifers used in many hydrologic reports of the Central Valley; <br /> Sacramento Valley(adapted from Bloyd, 1978);and San Joaquin Valley(adapted from Poland and Lofgren, 1984).B,Concept of single <br /> heterogeneous aquifer with varying vertical leakance and confinement(adapted from Williamson and others, 1989). <br />