Laserfiche WebLink
GROUND WATER Ili THE CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A31 <br /> The relation of storage and hydraulic head in a com- the predominant clay mineral in the major subsiding <br /> pacting aquifer system is shown in figure 20. Note that areas of the SanJoaquin Valley. Differences in hydraulic <br /> head declines are rapid when pumped water is derived head throughout the pumped interval also affect compac- <br /> from elastic storage but are slow when it is derived from tion;the rate of compaction is less when the water table <br /> inelastic storage. and artesian head are lowered simultaneously, as in a <br /> Water derived from compaction has varied from a few well that is perforated in both water-table and confined <br /> percent to more than 60 percent of the pumped water in zones. <br /> the subsiding areas.These differences were attributed to The factors influencing inelastic compaction and land <br /> variations in geology and well construction, as discussed subsidence are summarized in figure 21.Where wells are <br /> in chapter C(Page, 1986),and are summarized here. The perforated in confined zones of an aquifer system that <br /> percentage of fine-grained deposits within the stressed contain numerous thin lenses of compressible montmoril- <br /> interval and the mineralogy of these deposits are impar- lonite clay, inelastic compaction will be at a maximum- <br /> tant factors. In the Los Banos-Kettleman City area, an However,where wells tap both water-table and confined <br /> area of maximum land subsidence, the highest percent- zones and much of the perforated section falls within <br /> age of fine-grained deposits anywhere in the San Joaquin coarse-grained deposits, compaction will be minimal. <br /> Valley lies within the upper 2,606 ft of the aquifer The measured compaction in relation to head decline at <br /> system- Bull (1975, p. F49) suggested that within this two wells in subsiding areas from 1960 to 1980 is shown <br /> area, interlayering of thin-bedded, compressible fine- in figure 22. At each site, the 1960's were marked by <br /> grained sediments with permeable coarse-grained sedi- steady head decline and a high rate of compaction. The <br /> ments resulted in rapid and substantial compaction in decrease in ground-water pumpage in the early to middle <br /> response to water-level declines. Compaction is less with 1970's was accompanied by a steady recovery of water <br /> the same water-level declines in areas of coarse-grained levels and greatly reduced compaction. The resumption <br /> beds. of large ground-water withdrawals during the 1976-77 <br /> The type of clay mineral present influences subsidence; drought was marked by a sharp decline in water levels <br /> montmorilionite is highly susceptible to compaction and is and a short period of renewed compaction. Ireland and <br /> .. Water table Sand <br /> La' a Water table <br /> head difference Sand <br /> Small head difference <br /> Artesian head .� <br /> (lower sand) <br /> Gone of depression Artesian head I I <br /> (lower sand) t I <br /> - f <br /> Fine-grained 4ayers; mostly mommonllon+le clay - <br /> _- Fine-grained layers; little or no montmorillon-te clay <br /> Sand <br /> I I _ <br /> t ! I l <br /> Sand . <br /> �r Numerous thin <br /> Sand line-grained lenses <br /> i of mostly <br /> montmoriilonite clay <br /> — — =embedded in a sand �•I - <br /> f--� Sand <br /> __I Fine-grained layers; <br /> little or no <br /> monimorillonite clay <br /> B <br /> FicL%E 21—lnfluence of hydrogeology and well construction on potential for land subsidence.Dashed lines denote perforated <br /> sections of wet ls-A,High potential for subsidence.B.I..ow potential for subsidence. <br />