Laserfiche WebLink
A32 REGIONAL AQUIFER-SYSTEM ANALYSIS—CENTRAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA <br /> others (1984) reported that hydraulic heads generally the 1960's; consequently, when heavy pumpage resumed <br /> declined 10 to 20 times as fast during the drought as during the 197647 drought, very little compaction oc- <br /> during the period of long-term drawdown and compaction curred.Pumpage was supplied by elastic storage(a small <br /> that ended in the late 1960's. In 1975, hydraulic heads quantity) rather than by inelastic storage, so heads <br /> were much higher than the lowest heads reached during declined rapidly. Following the drought, recovery to <br /> predrought water levels was rapid and compaction vir- <br /> 350 tually ceased. <br /> F <br /> A 1 AREAL EXIEWr ANn EmicTs <br /> aaa ! <br /> In the Central Valley, land has subsided largely in the <br /> San Joaquin Valley south of the Merced River. This <br /> 450 subsidence was extensively documented by Poland and <br /> others (1975) and by Ireland and others(1984), and it is <br /> briefly summarized here. These two reports present <br /> sao detailed contour maps and profiles showing the areal <br /> extent and magnitude of subsidence and hydrographs <br /> relating water levels and compaction. <br /> LU550 1,0 w More than one-half of the San Joaquin Valley,or about <br /> Z z 5,200 mit, has undergone land subsidence of more than 1 <br /> ui - ft (fig. 19). Three major areas of subsidence within the <br /> a soa 0-5 Q valley are the Los Banos-Kettleman City area (western <br /> Fresno County),the Tulare-Wasco area(Tulare County), <br /> N a and the Arvin-Maricopa area(Kern County)(Poland and <br /> Z 0 a Lofgren, 1984). Of these, the Los Banos-Kettleman area <br /> -I - ca underwent by far the largest volume of subsidence, <br /> a amounting to two-thirds of the subsidence observed in <br /> Co '0 the Central Valley up to 1980. This long trough-like area, <br /> cc extending for about 80 mi along the west margin of the <br /> LU B ! valley, contains three depressions all characterized by <br /> � <br /> 350 more than 20 ft of subsidence at their centers. The <br /> a maximum subsidence recorded in the United States(29.6 <br /> 400ft) is within one of these depressions in western Fresno <br /> w County near the town of Mendota (fig. 23) (Ireland and <br /> others, 1984). <br /> 450 Subsidence began in the San Joaquin Valley in the <br /> y 1920's and increased slowly until World War II. Very <br /> {1, large increases in ground-water pumpage during the <br /> Sao t.n w 1940's and 1950's caused the volume of subsidence to <br /> increase dramatically. Pumpage increased further <br /> a through the mid-1960'.9 at an average withdrawal rate of <br /> 550 L, a nearly 12 million acre-ft/yr and subsidence increased <br /> accordingly. As of 1970, the total volume of subsidence <br /> was 15.6 million acre-ft/yr (Poland and others, 1975). <br /> Nor- <br /> i <br /> 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 <br /> YEAR <br /> Ficu[tE 22.--Changes in hydraulic head and compaction at two FiGuitE 23.--Magnitude of subsidence at a site 10 mi southwest of <br /> wells in subsiding areas of San Joaquin Valley, 1960 to 1980 Mendota in the San Joaquin Valley. Joseph F. Poland, principal <br /> (modified from Ireland and others, 1981). A, Air;in-Maricopa subsidence researcher of the U.S. Geological Survey, alongside a <br /> area(well depth 1,480 ft). R, Los Banos-Kettleman City area power pole that shows approximate position of land surface in 1925, <br /> (well depth 1,3513 ft). 1955,and 1977- Land surface was lowered 29.6 ft from 1925 to 1977. <br />