My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004401
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
9291
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-01-59
>
SU0004401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2022 5:13:40 PM
Creation date
4/20/2022 1:02:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004401
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
SA-01-59
STREET_NUMBER
9291
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
ENTERED_DATE
5/19/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9291 E HARNEY LN
RECEIVED_DATE
8/23/2001 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Joaquin County Community <br /> Development Dept . <br /> September 4, 2001 <br /> Page Two <br /> agreement, the County has authorized Mr. Hartzell to <br /> continue these activities pending the passing of the winery <br /> ordinance. Of course, that winery ordinance was approved <br /> on July 24, 2001, and the above-referenced application is <br /> being made pursuant to that ordinance. In order to assist <br /> the Department in dealing with that application, we would <br /> like to provide the Department with a bit of history <br /> concerning the ordinance and changes made thereto, a <br /> discussion of the allowable uses under the ordinance and an <br /> analysis of the application that has been filed. <br /> THE WINERY ORDINANCE <br /> The ordinance was redrafted numerous times . <br /> Almost all of the redrafting and referrals to subcommittees <br /> had to do with the definition of "marketing events" at <br /> wineries regulated by the ordinance . When the ordinance <br /> was ultimately passed, a section allowing facility rental <br /> was deleted from the ordinance in its entirety. The <br /> subject of our comments on the site approval application <br /> have to do with the portions related to marketing events, <br /> winery/wine seller facility rental events, and special <br /> events . <br /> The Board of Supervisors made it clear that <br /> rather than to have an ordinance which contained very <br /> specific rules which may or may not be applicable to all <br /> wineries, it would be appropriate for the Planning <br /> Department to make case by case determinations as to the <br /> appropriateness of these various events . Unfortunately, <br /> the supplemental information and marketing plans submitted <br /> by the applicant provides virtually no information from <br /> which the Planning Department could know anything about the <br /> nature, extent, and frequency of events planned at the <br /> proposed winery and, as a result, there is not sufficient <br /> information for the Department to attach meaningful <br /> conditions or limitations to these events . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.