My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0004401
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
9291
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-01-59
>
SU0004401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2022 5:13:40 PM
Creation date
4/20/2022 1:02:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0004401
PE
2632
FACILITY_NAME
SA-01-59
STREET_NUMBER
9291
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
ENTERED_DATE
5/19/2004 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9291 E HARNEY LN
RECEIVED_DATE
8/23/2001 12:00:00 AM
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
San Joaquin County Community <br /> Development Dept . <br /> September 4, 2001 <br /> Page Five <br /> The ordinance at Section 9-800 . 3 provides that <br /> the reviewing authority may require supplemental <br /> information in order to evaluate the land use impacts of <br /> the project. It further states that a marketing plan for <br /> wineries "shall provide a checklist describing the winery <br /> - and a narrative description of individual marketing <br /> events, and special events" . <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Based upon the foregoing, we would request that <br /> any site approval specify that rental of the facilities for <br /> parties, receptions, weddings, banquets or the like is not <br /> an approved marketing event. Site approval should also <br /> place limitations on the hours of operation, the number of <br /> people and the noise generated by special indoor events or <br /> special outdoor events . The applicant should be required <br /> to specifically identify each "marketing event" , "special <br /> indoor event" , and "special outdoor event" and provide the <br /> information requested in the supplemental information and <br /> marketing plan for each such event so that it may be <br /> properly evaluated by the Department and commented upon by <br /> surrounding property owners and other interested parties . <br /> I would urge the Department to take a strong and <br /> specific position with regard to this matter. Very <br /> specific conditions and limitations upon approval would <br /> eliminate the potential quagmire of enforcement problems . <br /> Requiring neighbors to litigate the issues of what is a <br /> "marketing event" and to monitor attendance, number of <br /> events, and decibel levels would produce an unfair burden <br /> on the neighbors . Without specific approval and <br /> definitions, we could foresee a nightmare of enforcement <br /> efforts which would involve the Sheriff, Community <br /> Development Enforcement, Public Works, Building Department, <br /> Environmental Health Division and the Fire Department. <br /> As an example of continued enforcement problems, <br /> I enclose laser copies of several photos that were taken on <br /> August 18, 2001, at about 7 :45 p.m. These photographs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.