Laserfiche WebLink
22 February 2019 <br />AGE-Project No. 14-3154 <br />Page 8 of 12 <br /> <br />The work will be performed following the procedures outlined in Section 6.0 of the EMMP. <br />Based on the quantity and results of the data collected during the April 2018 excavation <br />and removal activities at Parcel B, AGE proposes to collect verification samples on a grid- <br />pattern at 50-foot intervals (total of 7 samples) on Parcel A. If the dimensions of the <br />excavated area are larger than anticipated, additional verification samples will be <br />collected accordingly. Additional sampling will be performed as approved by the EHD. <br />Verification samples will be analyzed for the constituents listed in Section 6.4 of the <br />EMMP. Excavated waste materials will be stockpiled and sampled to characterize the <br />waste for disposal following the procedures listed in Section 6.5 of the EMMP. Except for <br />the DI WET analytical method, stockpiled waste samples will be analyzed for the <br />constituents listed in Section 6.5 of the EMMP (the DI WET testing is not considered <br />necessary since the excavated materials will be removed from the property for offsite <br />disposal and onsite reuse of the materials will not be considered/evaluated). All excavated <br />waste materials will be removed from the subject property and properly disposed. <br />Additional analyses of the stockpiled waste materials will be performed as required by the <br />receiving waste disposal facility. <br /> <br />All work associated with the excavation and waste removal activities will be documented <br />in a Verification Report. The report will include a description of work performed and the <br />results of sampling. Conclusions and recommendations will also be included in the report, <br />if applicable. The report will be reviewed and signed by a California Certified Engineering <br />Geologist. <br /> <br />To evaluate and characterize sample data collected from Parcel A, the findings and <br />results will be compared to the following appropriate environmental screening levels: the <br />June 2018 Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO), Human Health Risk Assessment <br />(HHRA)-Note 3 screening levels for industrial/commercial properties, published by the <br />California Department of Toxic Substance Control (herein referred to as DTSC-SLs); to <br />the May 2018 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 Regional Screening <br />Levels for industrial soil (herein referred to as RSLs); and to the January 2019 San <br />Francisco Bay RWQCB Environmental Screening Levels (TPH only) for <br />commercial/industrial shallow soil exposure (herein referred to as ESLs). Additionally, <br />water data, if collected, will be compared to the July 2014 State of California Maximum <br />Contaminant Levels (herein referred to as MCLs). Additionally, sample data will be <br />evaluated and compared to site-specific background concentrations that were developed <br />utilizing data collected from Parcels A and B. Specifically, arsenic will be evaluated using <br />the site-specific background concentration of 8.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). The <br />DTSC has determined that background concentrations of arsenic in California soils are <br />commonly high, ranging anywhere from 0.6 mg/kg to 11 mg/kg -Background <br />Concentrations of Metals, a Progress Report, Geological Services Unit, Glendale (Arsenic <br />in California Soils). The site-specific background concentration of 8.6 mg/kg for arsenic is <br />the maximum concentration detected in soil samples collected from Parcels A and B. <br />Background concentrations are listed in Table 1. <br /> <br />