Laserfiche WebLink
<br />west. The northern edge of the Property includes a set of railroad tracks which run east-west, <br />but are no longer in use. Attachment A is a Google Earth view of the power generation plant prior <br />to demolition. <br /> <br />Historical Use Information <br /> <br />Prior to development into the former power generation facility, the Property was believed to be <br />an empty lot, with suspected solid waste disposal by nearby industrial activities; and prior to that <br />use, the Property was believed to be cultivated agricultural land. The property was previously <br />owned by Libby Owens Ford/Pilkington North America (LOF/PNA) and the parcel was divided as <br />such to create a 20-acre parcel. The generation facility was constructed around 1989. <br /> <br />According to a former San Joaquin Cogen employee who was at the site since 1989 until <br />decommissioning, the following information is presented. The project development of the gas <br />fired power plant was believed to have been conducted by Power Systems Engineering in October <br />1989 (Original Developer) through the San Joaquin County Community Development Department <br />(building department) prior to the incorporation of the City of Lathrop. <br /> <br />The property was then believed to be owned and operated in some manner, per the former San <br />Joaquinn Cogen employee, by the following entities Dominion Resources, Destec/Dynergy, El <br />Paso Energy, MDU Resources, Heorot Power Holdings LLC (‘HPH”). <br /> <br />The San Joaquin Cogen power plant (“SJC Facility”) was acquired by HPH, formerly known as <br />Bicent Power LLC (Bicent Power LLC emerged from Chapter 11 in August 2012 and was renamed <br />HPH), on July 10, 2007. At the time of the acquisition of San Joaquin Cogen LLC in 2007, there <br />was no public records search performed beyond typical due diligence to gain additional land use <br />information. Black & Veatch Corporation (B&V) was engaged in 2007 to conduct a Phase I <br />Environmental Site Assessment (“Phase I ESA”). The purpose of the the Phase I ESA was to <br />identify, to the extent possible, recognized environmental conditions with respect to the range <br />of contaminants within the scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation <br />and Liability Act and petroleum products. B&V performed a records review and physical <br />inspection of the Property and conducted interviews. There was no sampling activities conducted <br />by B&V. B&V’s Phase I ESA reported evidence of impact from past owners or other industries in <br />the soil surrounding the Property and on the Property. <br /> <br />Another Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed by Tetra Tech, Inc. (“TT ESA <br />Phase I”) in April 2012. The TT ESA Phase I was conducted to identify recognized environmental <br />conditions. In this report, it identified no potential environmental concerns, however, some solid <br />waste disposal on the Property was noted based on aerial photographs taken in 2005-2006. <br /> <br />Based on aerial photographs taken over the development of the Property, some apparent waste <br />management or disposal activities have been conducted on the southern portion of the Property. <br />This resulted in the disposal of glass, metals and factory parts on the Property, based on the <br />observations of waste on 17100 Murphy Parkway. The limits of the waste disposal are only