SU0014965 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item No. 2 PC: 11-19-92 SU-92-9 Page 10 REFERRALS AND REPLIES The application referrals were mailed on April 29, 1992, with responses due by May 21, 1992. Department of Public Works (response: 5-20-92, 11-2-92, & 11-6-92): See 'Conditions of Approval.' Environmental Health Division (response: 5-14-92): See 'Conditions of Approval.' Building Inspection Division (response: 5-27-92): See 'Conditions of Approval.' Air Pollution Control District (responses: 5-14-92 & 10-1-92): See 'Environmental Considerations.' Caltrans (response: 6-9-92): See 'Conditions of Approval' and discussion under 'Transportation.' County Sheriff (response: 5-11-92): The Sheriff-Coroner's office recommends `that a mechanism be created to fund additional Sheriff resources so that we can keep pace with development.' Mosquito Abatement District (response: 5-18-92): The District noted that access to any ponds should be provided for maintenance and that a vector prevention plan should be developed for any area that will be collecting rainwater. Because the drainage will be maintained by a CSD, conditions regarding mosquito abatement are not recommended. Pacific Gas & Electric (response: 5-6-92): See 'Conditions of Approval.' Office of Planning and Research (response: 6-5-92): The OPR indicated that none of the State agencies have comments, and the County has complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents pursuant to CEQA. As of November 6, 1992, no responses were received from the following: Council of Governments (ALUC) State Department of Fish and Game Delta Fire District Lodi Unified School District Woodbridge Irrigation District Kingdon Airport APPLICATION DATA A legal ad for the public hearing was published in the Stockton Record on 11-9-92. No. of public hearing notices mailed: 17. Date: 11-6-92. The staff report was prepared by Chandler Martin.