Laserfiche WebLink
Item No . _6_ <br /> PC : 11-7-85 <br /> SU-84-6 <br /> Page 1 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission : <br /> 1 . Require dedication of a 60-foot right-of-way and 40 feet of <br /> improvements along Etcheverry Drive <br /> 2 . Require dedication of 10 feet and establish a setback line for <br /> an 84-foot right-of-way and 20 feet of improvements along the <br /> subdivision side of MacArthur Drive . <br /> 3 . Delete Condtion 3 .m. <br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> The request is to change conditions on a major subdivision . The <br /> request was filed under Section 9-9106 , which allows for con- <br /> sideration of a change in conditions when the requirement or con- <br /> dition of approval of the tentative map is not reasonable, or it; <br /> in need of clarification . The approving body may, upon written <br /> application of the subdivider or owner , modify such reqtit­;t , <br /> requirement , or condition. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> On August 2 , 1984 , the Planning Commission conditionally approved <br /> the subdivision. Dave Olmstead, representing the applicant , <br /> appealed a condition requiring terminal drainage . The Board of <br /> Supervisors, at its meeting of October 25 , 1984 , referred the <br /> application back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration <br /> of storm drainage. From October 25 , 1984 , to June 6 , 1985 , the <br /> applicant worked with the Department of Public Works to revise <br /> storm drainage requirements . On June 6, 1985 , the Planning <br /> Commission heard the subdivision application and considered the <br /> matter of storm drainage . The Commission approved the <br /> subdivision with community ponding as the method of storm <br /> drainage. The applicant appealed the Commission' s action to the <br /> Board of Supervisors . The Board of Supervisors, on July 23 , <br /> 1985 , approved drainage by individual ponding rather than by com- <br /> munity ponding. <br /> The applicant now is requesting reconsideration regarding improve- <br /> ments to MacArthur Drive and Etcheverry Drive . The applicant ' s <br /> opinion is that the Commission did not require these improvements <br /> as stated in the condition approved by the Commission on August 2 , <br /> 1984 , in condition 113 . j . " See attached list of conditions . This <br /> states that full street width improvements shall be required on <br /> Ftclieverry Drive and that Mau Arthur Drive shall be fully improved <br />