My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_1971-1981
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
CORRESPONDENCE_1971-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2023 4:13:14 PM
Creation date
8/29/2022 2:57:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1971-1981
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
438
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.�i <br />- -- -, - -- -4ww-p - - <br />Establishment of a privately <br />in recycling work that other- farm use, Michael said. <br />have the feeling we are bei, <br />operated recycling center and <br />wise might require action by He said 57 acres now are <br />picked on out there." <br />dump site southeast of Stock- <br />public agencies. used for grazing and 100 acres <br />Attorney H a r o 1 d J. Wil, <br />` <br />ton was approved by a 3-2 vote <br />The operation will not be a for row crops. <br />said one of his clients will ha <br />of the Board of Supervisors <br />dump site in the familiar Residents of the area, where <br />dumps on both side <br />yesterday. <br />sense, Wisdom said. a City of Stockton dump has <br />property. <br />The board approved of a use <br />Joseph Michael, attorney for been in use for years, were not <br />"He not only requests, he ' <br />permit for Forward, Inc., for <br />Forward, said tale recycling convinced that it all will work <br />plores you to reject the - <br />the operation overturned action <br />will be done in a building ap- well. <br />in Asserting that they already <br />mit," Willis said. <br />of the Board of Zoning Adjust- <br />proximately 75 x 100 feet <br />size, and no outside dust, .odor, put up with the city dump, the <br />Michael rejected suggesti <br />the recycling center be loca <br />ment last Aug. 10, when the re <br />quest was denied by a 41 vote. <br />Iroise, or other nuisance will a i r p o r t flight pattern, the <br />in an industrial area, say' <br />Proponents of the operation <br />result. Northern California Youth Cen- <br />LAND'S USE ter, and other things, Joanna <br />the economics of rehandl' <br />refuse that cannot be recyc <br />contended in a lengthy :tearing <br />The cut -and -fill a r e a will Grimes asked: <br />makes that impractical <br />yesterday that their plans and <br />take approximately 10 to 15 LAWYER OBJECTS <br />Michael said from WAo <br />the conditions attached to the <br />acres, and the remainder of "What else can the county do <br />per cent of t.1e solid w4v*ar±.: <br />use permit will prevent any <br />the property will, remain in to us on Austin Road? I sort of <br />died can be recycled; 'ai4jhe' <br />n u i s a n c e beingcreated, as <br />_-------..-- - <br />rest will be put in the auto <br />claimed by residents of the <br />and fill area. <br />area. <br />NO CANNERY WAST$ <br />The site is approximately 157 <br />Supervisors o h t a i n e d i} e <br />a c r e s, straddling Littlejohn <br />Creek on the west side of Aus- <br />' <br />stipulation that no c a n n e.'r c <br />tin Road, from 2, to 21/z miles <br />waste will be handled, and _ di, <br />south of Arch Road. <br />rected. that the operation <br />Opponents, -including a r e a <br />1 <br />be open to }public use unl <br />the board later orders this._" <br />r e s i d e'n t Mike Gikas, who <br />Forward had expressed a <br />spoke on behalf of the San Joa- <br />sire to handle only waste. <br />quin County Farm Bureau Fed- <br />business and industry, <br />eration, argued that the site is <br />, <br />from the general public. <br />not suitable for a dump, and <br />' <br />Declaring that the mini <br />the land should be left for <br />two -foot fill ON*.,the du <br />strictly agricultural use. <br />Supervisors Adrian Fondse <br />area is not eno h to ret <br />and Chairman Gary Wiler con- <br />the land to its present c <br />curred and voted against the <br />production ability, Fondse s <br />gested a six to eight foot <br />permit: <br />The other three, Supervisors <br />requirement, but received no <br />Carmen Perino, Dan S. Parises <br />support. <br />Mic:1ael insisted the opera - <br />and Clifford C. Wisdom, indi- <br />and <br />will not infringe on, l+ <br />cated they are satisfied the <br />county's contractual o b I i g ai <br />plant and dump can he oper- <br />f16ns:,with_;t!}e; Foothill Landfill <br />ated without detrimental ef- <br />Facility dti�hp, a claim made <br />lects. <br />PRIVATE ENTERPRISE <br />by Gerald Sherwin and DaiWk <br />They stressed their approval <br />k0 <br />of Wivate=.egaging <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.