SR0085789_SSCRPT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the Site; • Administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the Site; or • Notices from a governmental entity regarding violations of environmental laws or liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. • Ms. Kimbrough indicated that her family (the Machado's) have owned and operated the Site since 1971. Since her family has owned and operated at the Site, she indicated that they have grown oats in the winter and corn in the spring. Ms. Kimbrough also indicated that she recalled the family applying Round -up (for weed control) and UAN32 (Nitrogen) to the corn crops in the spring and summer. She indicated that there are two septic tanks at the Site (adjacent to the residences) and that to the best of her knowledge there are no and never have been any underground or aboveground storage tanks at the Site. Ms. Kimbrough did indicate that in approximately 2003, one of the two residences was identified as an illegal drug lab. She indicated that the materials were removed and no further action was required. Additional information obtained from interviews is presented in subsequent sections of this report. 6.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE The Federal AAI rule (40CFR 312.28) and ASTM E 1527-13 require that all appropriate inquiry must take into account relevant and applicable specialized knowledge and experience on the part of the User regarding the subject property, the area surrounding the subject property, the conditions of adjoining properties, and any other experience relevant to identifying RECs on the subject property. CAC submitted a written questionnaire to the User inquiring whether the User had any specialized knowledge or experience relative to this inquiry. The User responded that he had no such specialized knowledge or experience. A copy of the questionnaire is provided in Appendix D. 6.3 RELATIONSHIP TO PURCHASE PRICE TO VALUE OF PROPERTY The federal AAI rule (40 CFR 312.29) and ASTM E 1527-13 require that all appropriate inquiry must take into account the relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property, if it was not contaminated. The rule states that this portion of the inquiry may be the responsibility of the User, and the User has the option of sharing or not sharing this information with the Environmental Professional performing the Phase I ESA. Based on information provided to CAC by the User, there was no significant relationship between the purchase price and value of the property (Site). m