COMPLIANCE INFO_2023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Presto, Carol [EHD] From: Presto, Carol [EHD] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2023 3:58 PM To: Jennifer Manning Cc: Jay Grubb;Alexia Inigues; Chealsea Biggs; Steven Nelson; Silvia Gonzalez;Jamie Stewart; Ray Subject: RE: CA - Costco Gasoline Tracy 658/ NOV for CERS ID 10146285 - Expansion/ BCE# 10050.11 a Hi Jennifer, #111—There were no emails attached regarding fuel drop requests.The email from Jones Covey attached discusses no individual work orders available for 6/6/2022-9/2/2022. Please review the inspection report. #111 discusses overfill test results dated 8/26/2022 that were submitted to EHD. #111 does not discuss anything regarding fuel drop requests. In addition you state that no testing was conducted that day, 8/26/2022,yet EHD received test results for 8/26/2022 for overfill testing.These overfill test results for 8/26/2022 were also included in the previously submitted return to compliance packet. EHD was not notified of any overfill testing that was scheduled for 8/26/2022. We were notified of the 8/30/2022 overfill testing and were on site.The email correspondence from your previous packet shows a request to schedule testing 8/30/2022 -8/31/2022 (which included overfill) and ELD on 8/25/2022. Review details in the inspection report amended 12/29/2022 and corrective actions required. #115—closed based on statement #203— 1. The attached is not an alarm history and if the panel was replaced same day 6/6/2022 then you should have had a working panel 6/6/2022 through project completion.The document submitted shows a time period before the panel was replaced. We need it after it was replaced throughout the duration of the installation and upgrade construction project. 2. See the inspection appointments on the temporary closure permit.The tanks did not go through any of the inspections listed on the temporary closure.The temporary closure permit was approved in case Costco decided to temporarily close the tanks during the project so Costco already had a permit in place but the tanks were not temporarily closed.To be temporarily closed the product needs to be removed and product was kept in the tanks. 3. The attached work order with the Order Date of 9/30/2022 does not reference at all a technician coming out and determining the drop tube to be faulty. It only references that drop tubes were installed 10/10/2022 on the Tank 2 87B tank. Bruno Espinoza's email from 11/4/2022 stated that a technician came out on 9/27/2022 to inspect the tubes and determined faulty. Do technicians typically not leave work orders on site when they do inspections on your system?We typically see work orders on site at facilities even for inspecting a UST component and not doing any work that day. How was the site notified of the faulty drop tube? How are you keeping records of issues with the UST system if technicians don't leave work orders? 4. Was there an overall end of project work order submitted for the tank installation and upgrade completion? • For the request for the work order for 9/14/2022, 1 noticed what was sent 1/26/2022 was actually a work order with a trip date of 9/13/2022.Was Bruno's email a typo on the date stating that a technician came out and verified drop tubes were correct measurements on 9/14/2022 and he actually meant to say 9/13/2022? 1