Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Alan Biedermann <br /> October 11 , 1988 <br /> Page 2 <br /> (b) No less than 120 days before the permit is due <br /> for review, the operator shall submit an application <br /> for review of its permit. The application shall be <br /> made in the manner specified in Section 18201 . Sec- <br /> tion 18202 through 18208 shall apply to the applica- <br /> tion for review. <br /> (c) If the enforcement agency determines upon review <br /> that revision is not required it shall give notice of <br /> its decision and the reasons therefor to the board and <br /> to any person who has requested in writing that he or <br /> she be given such notice. Said notice shall be set <br /> forth on a form approved by the board. <br /> (d) A solid waste facilities permit does not expire <br /> at the end of five years absent an express permit term <br /> or condition limiting the period of the permit. <br /> Comment: An application for review is not an applica- <br /> tion for a permit nor an application for a permit <br /> renewal. <br /> Sections 18210 , 19211 , 18212 , and this section provide <br /> that the same form be used for a notice of operation, <br /> an application for permit revision, an application for <br /> reinstatement of a revoked permit, and an application <br /> for review of a permit as is used for an application <br /> for an initial permit for a new facility. These provi- <br /> sions are intended to avoid the promulgation of sever- <br /> al forms requiring nearly identical information. <br /> However, where the legal standards to be applied dif- <br /> fer, the local enforcement agency and the board will <br /> vary the content of the hearings and their delibera- <br /> tions. <br /> The CWMB letter refers to a "revised facilities per- <br /> mit" in at least four places on the first page, and seems <br /> to be assuming that the permit is being modified or re- <br /> vised. [Part of this confusion may have arisen due to our <br /> statement concerning food processing wastes, which we hope- <br /> fully will correct below. ] <br /> This assumption of a modification, or revision, or <br /> renewal is both incorrect, and important. <br /> It is incorrect in that Forward, Inc. has not asked <br /> for any modification, revision, or renewal (see below for <br /> food processing waste discussion) and is not so asking. <br />