Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Alan Biedermann <br /> October 11 , 1988 <br /> Page 5 <br /> the existing permit. There is, therefore, no "project" <br /> requiring an environmental review. <br /> Third, CWMB indicated that: 3. Receipt of food pro- <br /> cessing wastes. The receipt of food processing wastes was <br /> not included in the existing permit. It is included in the <br /> proposed permit. Also, the existing permit prohibited the <br /> disposal of cannery wastes. Cannery wastes are considered <br /> a subdivision of food processing wastes. <br /> Here, CWMB is correct - this is a change in the per- <br /> mit, and has not been previously evaluated, and would re- <br /> quire an environmental review! <br /> Accordingly, we withdraw any request, actual or im- <br /> plied, which we may have made, to take food processing <br /> waste. we will continue under that term of the existing <br /> permit which prohibits taking such waste. <br /> Very truly yo <br /> J N W. STOVALL <br /> ttorney at Law <br /> JWS/djk <br /> cc: Greg Basso <br /> Dan Maglionico <br /> Alfred Olsen (Environmental Health Div. ) <br /> Don Dier, Jr. (CA Waste Mgmnt. Bd. ) <br /> Martha Vazquez (CA Waste Mgmnt. Bd. ) <br />