Laserfiche WebLink
3. Engineering Review of Tanks & Equipment Covered by CalARP Program <br />C:\TRICH\Jobs\4515582 Leprino Tracy\Report\Leprino Tracy CalARP 040221.docx 3-9 <br />vestibule. Each unit appears to be supported by four hangers at the top four corners of <br />the units. All hangers appear to be approximately 12 inches or less below the support <br />framing. Transverse and longitudinal bracing recommended in previous CalARP <br />evaluations has been installed. <br />Rail Vestibule <br />Evaporative coils EV-13 (Figures 3-64 and 3-65), EV-14 (Figures 3-66 and 3-67) and <br />EV-15 (Figures 3-68 and 3-69) are suspended from the roof framing of the rail vestibule. <br />Each unit appears to be supported by four hangers at the top four corners of the units. <br />All hangers appear to be approximately 12 inches or less below the support framing. <br />Transverse and longitudinal bracing recommended in previous CalARP evaluations has <br />been installed. <br />Product Cooler <br />Evaporative coils EV-18 and EV-19 are suspended from the roof framing of the product <br />cooler. Each unit appears to be supported by four hangers that are part of two trapezes <br />at the bottom of the units (Figure 3-70). The units are braced in the transverse direction <br />by Unistrut type struts to the adjacent wall at each end of both units at the top and <br />bottom of the units (Figure 3-71). It is unknown what strut members were used, but they <br />appear to be marginal. Based on site observations, it appears the adjacent wall is a <br />masonry partition wall with wood furring. It is unknown whether the struts are anchored <br />to the masonry wall or furring or how the furring is attached to the masonry. In the <br />longitudinal direction, the units appear to be connected by similar struts at the top of the <br />units which are in turn attached to the bottom of a roof glue laminated girder <br />(Figure 3-72). The struts and connection to the roof girder appear marginal. It is <br />recommended that additional analysis be performed to confirm the adequacy of the <br />existing bracing and design any new bracing as necessary. <br />Glycol Room 1 <br />The Glycol Chiller GCH-1 and AV-306 are well mounted to a support frame with twelve <br />support legs (Figures 3-73 to 3-75). Based on recommendations from the previous <br />evaluation, all support skid legs have been anchored with a ½-inch diameter anchor <br />(Figure 3-76). The result of our anchorage analysis is a maximum DCR ratio of 0.69 <br />indicating that the existing anchorage is adequate. This result is based on ½-inch <br />diameter post installed expansion anchors with an embedment of 3 ¼-inches. If actual