My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.6 Energy <br /> Operations <br /> The Project would assist the State of California in achieving or exceeding its RPS and GHG <br /> emissions reduction objectives by developing and constructing a new California BESS to store <br /> renewable energy, which also would help in achieving or exceeding its energy storage mandates. <br /> Net consumption of electricity associated with efficiency loss of equipment would be negligible <br /> during operation of the Project. <br /> Fuel consumption from operations is expected to be minimal, as the facility would be unstaffed <br /> and would require minimal vehicle usage for O&M. The Project would emit 13.6 metric tons of <br /> CO2 (13,600 kilograms) annually during operations, as calculated in the Air Quality and <br /> Greenhouse Gas Technical Report for the Project, included as Appendix D to this EIR. Assuming <br /> operational CO2 would primarily be emitted from worker vehicles, 13.6 metric tons of CO2 equates <br /> to 708 gallons of gasoline consumption, using the 19.2 kilograms per gallon conversion factor <br /> (The Climate Registry 2022). As a battery storage project that absorbs energy during periods of <br /> increased energy production and releases energy during peak demands for energy, the Project <br /> would have a positive effect on the peak and base period system demands for electricity. <br /> As described above, the activities associated with construction of the Project are conservatively <br /> estimated to consume a total of 225,924 gallons of diesel fuel annually during construction. Fuel <br /> used during operations is calculated to be 708 gallons of gasoline per year). By comparison, the <br /> amount of petroleum consumed in the state of California was 13.8 billion gallons of gasoline and <br /> 1.6 billion gallons of diesel in 2021 (CEC 2022b). As a result, the proposed Project would not <br /> result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary <br /> consumption of energy resources during Project construction or operation. <br /> Mitigation: None required. <br /> IMPACT 4.6-2: Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable <br /> energy or energy efficiency? (No Impact) <br /> The proposed Project would assist the State of California in achieving or exceeding its RPS and <br /> GHG emissions reduction objectives by developing and constructing a new California BESS to <br /> store renewable energy, which would also help the state in achieving or exceeding its energy <br /> storage mandates. As an energy storage facility, the Project would be consistent with the Clean <br /> Air Plan Energy Control Measure EN 1, Decarbonize Electricity Production, which supports local <br /> renewable energy programs and strives to maximize the amount of renewable energy produced <br /> and used for electricity in the Bay Area (BAAQMD 2017). The Project would not conflict or obstruct <br /> with a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. <br /> Mitigation: None required. <br /> 4.6.6 PG&E Tesla Substation Improvements and Gen-tie <br /> To accommodate the Project, PG&E would be responsible for siting, design, and construction of <br /> the gen-tie line from the point of change of ownership (POCO) to its substation. Two options are <br /> available for the gen-tie line route from this point. The first option would be to connect via an <br /> aboveground line from the POCO to a point on the west side of the southwestern boundary of the <br /> substation. The second option is to enter the substation on the southwestern edge by way of a <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.6-6 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.