Laserfiche WebLink
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> estimate the GHG emissions during construction and operation of the proposed Project. Total <br /> construction emissions from the Project were annualized over a Project life of 30 years to derive <br /> amortized annual emissions and combined with the Project's annual operational emissions <br /> derived from CaIEEMod for comparison with CAPCOA's threshold. <br /> Project emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O were multiplied with their respective global warming <br /> potentials of 1, 25, and 298 and summed together to estimate CO2e emissions. Additionally, <br /> Project GHG emissions would include fugitive emissions of SF6 from high-voltage circuit breakers <br /> at the onsite substation. The SF6 GWP is equivalent to 22,800 times that of CO2. CO2, emissions <br /> resulting from SF6 gas leakage at the Project were estimated for the two high-voltage circuit <br /> breakers, each with a capacity of up to 160 pounds of SF6 for a total of up to 320 pounds, <br /> assuming a maximum leak rate of 0.5 percent per year. The R-134A GWP is 1,430 times that of <br /> CO2. The Project will have approximately 500 battery storage units with a leak rate of <br /> approximately 0.035 pounds of R-134A per unit. <br /> 4.8.4 Thresholds of Significance <br /> Under CEQA, a project would have a significant impact to GHG emissions if it would: <br /> a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a <br /> significant impact on the environment, or <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of <br /> reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. <br /> In the Guidance for Valley Land-Use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New <br /> Projects Under CEQA and the policy Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for Stationary Source <br /> Projects Under CEQA When Serving as the Lead Agency (SJVAPCD 2009a), BPS are used to <br /> assess significance of project-specific GHG emissions on global climate change during the <br /> environmental review process. However, the SJVAPCD's adopted BPS are specifically directed <br /> at reducing GHG emissions from stationary sources; therefore, the adopted BPS would not <br /> generally be applicable to the Project as the Project would not be a stationary source of emissions. <br /> The SJVAPCD guidance does not limit a lead agency's authority in establishing its own process <br /> and guidance for determining significance of project-related impacts on global climate change. <br /> The SJVAPCD supports the use of the interim thresholds as established by CAPCOA when <br /> adopted thresholds are not applicable. A new threshold has not been established to meet SB 32 <br /> targets beyond 2020. <br /> 4.8.5 Impacts Analysis <br /> IMPACT 4.8-1: Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, <br /> that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Less Than Significant Impact); and <br /> IMPACT 4.8-2: Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for <br /> the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (No Impact) <br /> Construction Emissions <br /> Construction of the Project would increase GHG generation, which can contribute to global <br /> climate change. This analysis is provided in response to recent heightened interest in the subject <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.8-9 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />