My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.13 Noise <br /> 4.13.3 Thresholds of Significance <br /> The following thresholds of significance are based on Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The <br /> proposed Project would have a significant impact to noise if it would: <br /> a) Result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise <br /> levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general <br /> plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; <br /> b) Result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; <br /> c) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where <br /> such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, <br /> expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. <br /> 4.13.4 Impact Analysis <br /> IMPACT 4.13-1: Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent <br /> increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in <br /> the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Less than <br /> Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated) <br /> Construction <br /> The Acoustical Analysis Report (Appendix F) estimated the noise levels generated by the Project <br /> during each stage of construction. Acoustic emission levels for activities associated with Project <br /> construction were based on typical ranges of energy equivalent noise levels at construction sites, <br /> as documented by the USEPA (1971) and the USEPA's Construction Noise Control Technology <br /> Initiatives (1980). The USEPA methodology distinguishes between type of construction and <br /> construction stage. <br /> The basic model assumed spherical wave divergence from a point source located at the center <br /> of the Project site to each receptor structure. Furthermore, the model conservatively assumed <br /> that all pieces of construction equipment associated with an activity would operate simultaneously <br /> for the duration of that activity. An additional level of conservatism was built into the construction <br /> noise model by excluding potential shielding effects due to intervening structures and buildings <br /> along the propagation path from the site to receiver locations. <br /> The construction processes are anticipated to occur during a period of approximately 15 months <br /> and begin in 2024. Project construction would generally consist of five major stages. The first <br /> stage would include mobilization, site preparation, fencing, and laydown. The second stage would <br /> involve excavation, trenching, and trench backfill. The medium-voltage stations would sit on <br /> concrete foundations or driven piles, pending final design. The construction noise analysis <br /> conservatively assumes pile driving will be required for this activity as part of the second stage. <br /> Pile driving would be the worst-case option in terms of noise as opposed to using concrete <br /> foundations. The third stage includes installation of cables and utilities. The fourth stage includes <br /> construction and installation of the battery storage units, and also includes commissioning and <br /> testing.. The final stage includes road paving. Table 4.13-5 summarizes the proposed equipment <br /> to be used for each stage and the associated noise level of the equipment. Table 4.13-6 <br /> summarizes the received construction noise levels at each NSA. <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.13-9 Tetra Tech/2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.