My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.15 Transportation <br /> 4.15.3 Thresholds of Significance <br /> In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Project would have <br /> a significant transportation impact if it would: <br /> a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation <br /> system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; <br /> b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b); <br /> c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or <br /> dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment); or <br /> d) Result in inadequate emergency access. <br /> 4.15.4 Impacts Analysis <br /> 4.15.4.1 Methodology <br /> Trip Generation <br /> Typically, most transportation studies focus on impacts after a project is constructed and in <br /> operation, as the expected traffic generation once in operation is usually higher than that <br /> generated under any construction phase or combination of phases. For this Project, however, the <br /> reverse is true. As such, the transportation analysis presented below focuses on construction- <br /> related impacts as operation of the proposed Project would generate minimal to no peak hour <br /> trips and minimal VMT. <br /> The Project's vehicular trip generation analysis is based on data provided by the Project Applicant <br /> on proposed construction activities. Specific data used include the anticipated construction <br /> schedule, maximum number of workers onsite during each construction phase, vendor trips, and <br /> truck haul trips required to complete each phase. As discussed in the Traffic Impact Study <br /> (Appendix G), the Project has a construction schedule of approximately 15 months, including 3 <br /> months of commissioning. Total trip generation will vary depending on the specific phase and <br /> construction stage, as will each type of trip. At peak construction, there will be approximately 60 <br /> workers and 10 to 20 trucks per day. The peak period is approximately 5 months. Worker vehicle <br /> trips, vendor trips, and truck haul trips are estimated separately as they represent distinct trip <br /> types. Detailed Project trip generation calculations are provided in Appendix A of the Traffic <br /> Impact Study. <br /> For the purposes of CEQA, the values shown in Table 2-2, Construction Equipment and Vehicle <br /> Trips Per Phase, in Chapter 2. Project Description, provide a conservative scenario in that they <br /> represent the peak of Project construction activities that would occur for approximately 5 months. <br /> The Project traffic distribution is a reasonable estimate based on the battery equipment <br /> manufacturer, proximity to cities, commonality of the remaining materials like fencing and <br /> concrete, location of hotels, and size of local communities for both attractiveness for workers to <br /> stay there and likelihood that local residents would work on the Project. Based on these <br /> considerations, it is expected that the Project battery equipment would arrive by ship to the Port <br /> of Oakland, which is 47 miles from the Project location. The battery equipment would likely be <br /> delivered with standard, five-axle semi-trucks by way of I-5 to the Project location and are <br /> assumed to be 50 percent of the total materials loads. The remaining materials and equipment <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.15-12 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.