Laserfiche WebLink
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.15 Transportation <br /> development of multimodal transportation networks. Based on these CEQA criteria, the Project <br /> would have a less than significant impact for VMT during construction. <br /> The operations VMT is considerably less than that of the construction VMT. During operations, <br /> there would be no daily workers commuting to or from the Project site. Though only one or two <br /> workers would be anticipated to visit the site each week, for modeling purposes a conservative <br /> estimate of the VMT for operations would assume two workers from the city of Oakland every <br /> week, which is a maximum of 4,857 VMT per year during operations. This rate would be typical <br /> throughout the operational life of the facility. There would likely be occasional larger repair <br /> operations, but these would be infrequent and of short durations. Given the short duration and <br /> infrequency of the repairs, these occurrences would add so few VMT that it is not a meaningful <br /> inclusion in the analysis. Over the next 20 years, the total VMT for operations is likely less than <br /> 97,136 miles and the Project would have a less than significant impact for VMT during operations. <br /> Reduction of GHG Emissions <br /> The Project is a battery energy storage system facility and the chief aim of constructing such <br /> facilities is to increase local energy storage capacity. This Project would support the state policies <br /> necessary to meet the California renewable energy standards. California has proceeded to <br /> advance energy storage uses to support the grid, including the passage of Assembly Bill 2514, <br /> as well as the resulting CPUC decision for energy procurement targets for each of the investor- <br /> owned utilities. The proposed Project would address the limitations of the electrical grid by the <br /> increasing demand for renewable energy. Layering energy storage systems into the energy grid <br /> improves grid reliability and makes it more resilient to disturbances and peaks in energy demand. <br /> The Project and other energy storage systems are used to supply power during brief disturbances, <br /> reduce outages and associated impacts to the community, and substitute for certain large footprint <br /> transmission and disruption upgrades. <br /> Additionally, the Applicant conducted an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report for <br /> San Joaquin County, which concluded a "less than significant impact" for both construction and <br /> operations emissions (see Appendix D). The GHG technical report identified a quantitative <br /> threshold of significance for GHG emissions. The analysis included in that report accounted for <br /> construction traffic emissions to determine the total emissions for the Project. Using this definitive <br /> quantitative metric yielded a "less than significant impact." Based on this conclusion, a threshold <br /> value for VMT would likely be much higher than the Project-generated VMT. This assertion is in <br /> line with the fact that the guidance for conducting VMT analysis originated with GHG emissions <br /> reduction regulations and goals, and the guidance states "OPR recommends using quantitative <br /> VMT thresholds linked to GHG reduction targets when methods exist to do so." <br /> Diversity of Land Use <br /> Diversity of land use is a more difficult criteria to quantify for a comparative analysis. According <br /> to CEQA (2018), <br /> State law concerning the development of multimodal transportation networks and <br /> diversity of land uses requires planning for and prioritizing increases in complete <br /> streets and infill development but does not mandate a particular depth of <br /> implementation that could translate into a particular threshold of significance. <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.15-16 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />