My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LESA Model Administrative Draft <br /> Griffith Energy Storage, LLC Technical Memorandum <br /> economic return per acre unit. The Project Size rating is determined by summing the acres in a project that <br /> fall within one of three consolidated LCC categories. <br /> Under the Project Size Score rating(Table 2), relatively fewer acres of high-quality soils are required to <br /> achieve a maximum Project Size Score.The proposed Project area received scores of 0 in all categories. <br /> Table 2. Project Size Scores <br /> LCC Class 1-11 LCC Class III LCC Class IV-VIII <br /> Total Acres 9.6 0 22.6 <br /> Project Size Scores' 0 0 0 <br /> Highest Project Size Score 0 <br /> 'Project Size Score was determined from the Project Size Scoring Table from the LESA Instruction Manual CDC 1997). <br /> Water Resources Availability <br /> The Water Resources Availability rating for the proposed Project is based upon identifying the various sources <br /> that may supply the Project area,and then determining whether different restrictions in supply are likely to <br /> take place in years that are characterized as being periods of drought and non-drought.Table 3 summarizes <br /> the limited water availability in the proposed Project area. <br /> The Water Resources Availability Score is scored on a scale of 1-100.The land is not irrigated and therefore <br /> only suited for grazing in the wet season. <br /> Table 3. Water Resources Availability <br /> A B C D E <br /> Project Portion Water Source Proportion of Project Water Availability Weighted Availability Score <br /> Area Score C x D <br /> All None 1 20 20 <br /> Total Water Resource Score 20 <br /> 'Water Resources Availability Score was determined from the scoring table from the LESA Instruction Manual(CDC 1997). <br /> Surrounding Agricultural Land Rating <br /> The Surrounding Agricultural Land Rating is designed to provide a measurement of the level of agricultural <br /> land use for lands within the Zone of Influence of the Project area.The California Agricultural LESA Model <br /> rates the potential significance of the conversion of an agricultural parcel that has a large proportion of <br /> surrounding land in agricultural production more highly than one that has a relatively small percentage of <br /> surrounding land in agricultural production. <br /> The Surrounding Protected Resource Land Rating is essentially an extension of the Surrounding Agricultural <br /> Land Rating and is scored in a similar manner. Protected resource lands are those lands with long term use <br /> restrictions that are compatible with or supportive of agricultural uses of land including: publicly owned lands <br /> TETRA TECH <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.