Laserfiche WebLink
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.1 Aesthetics <br /> The Project will also be evaluated as to the level of contrast Project elements exhibit to the existing <br /> visual character of the Project site and area, as shown in Table 4.1-2. <br /> Table 4.1-1. Degree of Contrast Rating System <br /> Degree of Contrast Rating Criteria <br /> None The element contrast is not visible or perceived. <br /> Weak The element contrast can be seen but does not attract attention. <br /> Moderate The element contrast begins to attract attention and begins to dominate the characteristic landscape. <br /> Strong The element contrast demands attention,will not be overlooked,and is dominant in the landscape. <br /> Source:BLM 2010 <br /> Contrast ratings for the expected condition with the Project were prepared for each representative <br /> viewpoint using a form adapted from BLM's Visual Contrast Rating Worksheet(Form 8400-4); the <br /> results are included in Appendix C. <br /> In general, visual impacts are determined based on the level of contrast the project introduces to <br /> the existing visual character of the project site and area, the sensitivity of the viewers, and the <br /> visibility of the project site. If these factors result in a change in visual class and/or a significant <br /> change in visual quality ratings, the impacts are likely to be adverse. <br /> 4.1.1.2 Viewshed <br /> The viewshed is generally the area that is visible from an observer's viewpoint and includes the <br /> screening effects of intervening vegetation and/or physical structures. Although some portion of <br /> the Project site may be visible from a relatively large area, the degree of visibility would depend <br /> on distance and view angle. Generally, the Project site would be most visible from viewpoints <br /> within 1 mile, while site visibility would diminish as distance increases and view angle decreases. <br /> Air quality, including dust and other visible particulates, can affect visibility in the area. Distance <br /> is only one of the factors that determine visibility of a site from a viewpoint. Terrain, vegetation, <br /> and structural features can obscure views that might otherwise be available at a certain distance. <br /> A viewshed analysis is a graphic representation of locations that may have views of all or portions <br /> of the Project based on topography within the Project Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI). A viewshed <br /> analysis is a graphic representation of the seen and unseen areas adjacent to the Project based <br /> on topography within the Project ZVI. The viewshed analysis was conducted using Esri ArcGIS <br /> geographic information system (GIS) software with the Spatial Analyst extension to process 10- <br /> meter digital elevation models, the height of the battery storage enclosures, and the gen-tie line <br /> above ground surface (Figure 4.1-1). The viewshed assumed "bare earth" conditions and was run <br /> from the Project area looking out to determine areas with potential visibility. The assumed "bare <br /> earth" conditions mean identification of areas with potential views of the Project were based on <br /> topography only. The analysis is also conservative because it does not account for screening by <br /> intervening structures, vegetation, curvature of the earth, small terrain changes, atmospheric <br /> conditions and attenuation, or other features. The ZVI was used to assist with the identification of <br /> potential KOPs. <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.1-5 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />