My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0015801
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
20042
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2200137
>
SU0015801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2024 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
8/31/2023 1:18:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0015801
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2200137
STREET_NUMBER
20042
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377-
APN
20910019, 99B-7885-002, 99B-7590-1-3
ENTERED_DATE
8/29/2023 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20042 W PATTERSON PASS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/14/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
987
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Environmental Analysis <br /> 4.1 Aesthetics <br /> The Project will also be evaluated as to the level of contrast Project elements exhibit to the existing <br /> visual character of the Project site and area, as shown in Table 4.1-2. <br /> Table 4.1-1. Degree of Contrast Rating System <br /> Degree of Contrast Rating Criteria <br /> None The element contrast is not visible or perceived. <br /> Weak The element contrast can be seen but does not attract attention. <br /> Moderate The element contrast begins to attract attention and begins to dominate the characteristic landscape. <br /> Strong The element contrast demands attention,will not be overlooked,and is dominant in the landscape. <br /> Source:BLM 2010 <br /> Contrast ratings for the expected condition with the Project were prepared for each representative <br /> viewpoint using a form adapted from BLM's Visual Contrast Rating Worksheet(Form 8400-4); the <br /> results are included in Appendix C. <br /> In general, visual impacts are determined based on the level of contrast the project introduces to <br /> the existing visual character of the project site and area, the sensitivity of the viewers, and the <br /> visibility of the project site. If these factors result in a change in visual class and/or a significant <br /> change in visual quality ratings, the impacts are likely to be adverse. <br /> 4.1.1.2 Viewshed <br /> The viewshed is generally the area that is visible from an observer's viewpoint and includes the <br /> screening effects of intervening vegetation and/or physical structures. Although some portion of <br /> the Project site may be visible from a relatively large area, the degree of visibility would depend <br /> on distance and view angle. Generally, the Project site would be most visible from viewpoints <br /> within 1 mile, while site visibility would diminish as distance increases and view angle decreases. <br /> Air quality, including dust and other visible particulates, can affect visibility in the area. Distance <br /> is only one of the factors that determine visibility of a site from a viewpoint. Terrain, vegetation, <br /> and structural features can obscure views that might otherwise be available at a certain distance. <br /> A viewshed analysis is a graphic representation of locations that may have views of all or portions <br /> of the Project based on topography within the Project Zone of Visual Influence (ZVI). A viewshed <br /> analysis is a graphic representation of the seen and unseen areas adjacent to the Project based <br /> on topography within the Project ZVI. The viewshed analysis was conducted using Esri ArcGIS <br /> geographic information system (GIS) software with the Spatial Analyst extension to process 10- <br /> meter digital elevation models, the height of the battery storage enclosures, and the gen-tie line <br /> above ground surface (Figure 4.1-1). The viewshed assumed "bare earth" conditions and was run <br /> from the Project area looking out to determine areas with potential visibility. The assumed "bare <br /> earth" conditions mean identification of areas with potential views of the Project were based on <br /> topography only. The analysis is also conservative because it does not account for screening by <br /> intervening structures, vegetation, curvature of the earth, small terrain changes, atmospheric <br /> conditions and attenuation, or other features. The ZVI was used to assist with the identification of <br /> potential KOPs. <br /> Griffith Energy Storage Project 4.1-5 Tetra Tech/SCH 2022120675 <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report August 2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.