My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0084279
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HENRY
>
16551
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
SR0084279
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2023 2:21:10 PM
Creation date
11/21/2023 1:29:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
SR0084279
PE
4403
FACILITY_NAME
HENRY ROAD COMPOSTING
STREET_NUMBER
16551
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HENRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
APN
22916033
ENTERED_DATE
9/28/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
16551 S HENRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i The operator needs to list (and consider) ail feedstock received. Many compostable materials have very <br />distinctive odor -generating properties. Descriptions that contain the type and source of the material are <br />especially helpful; such as, "two week collection cycle, curbside green material," or "private hauler, <br />landscraper-collected, yard trimmings," or "morning -delivered, by end -dump, 95% moisture biosolids," <br />or <br />"unground, grocery produce with associated packaging by walking -floor trailer." <br />ii Compostable materials used on-site for beneficial use are generally considered removed from the site. <br />iii The distribution of receptors and their relationship to surrounding land use is extremely important. <br />The <br />description of surrounding land uses may also assist in identifying other potential odor sources. <br />iv An odor complaint receipt procedure is an integral part of the GIMP. The information provided by the <br />complainant can be extremely valuable to site operations personnel. A typical odor response protocol <br />might be: <br />When a complaint is received, designated site personnel will: <br />1. Obtain time, location, and nature or characteristics of the odor and record that information to <br />review for operational trends (see 4.). <br />2. If practical, proceed to the location of the complaint to verify that the site is indeed <br />responsible for <br />the odor. Otherwise, investigate the probable source of the odor complaint and implement <br />operational changes to minimize odors. <br />3. If warranted, meet with the LEA and complainant (if known and choosing to participate) <br />within a <br />reasonable time frame to discuss the nature of the source of the odor and operational changes <br />proposed and/or implemented. <br />4. Document the complaint(s) in the Operations/Complaint Log, including the nature of the <br />complaint <br />Odors generated after turning <br />Increase turning frequency, <br />increase pile porosity, add <br />odor -absorbing amendment <br />(like wood chips, sawdust, wood <br />ash) <br />Long retention time <br />Remove chipped and ground <br />material more frequently <br />Curing Piles/ Product Storage <br />Odors present at time of loading <br />Decrease pile size, increase <br />Area <br />(temperatures above 122 °F) <br />windrow time prior to moving <br />to curing piles or product <br />storage <br />i The operator needs to list (and consider) ail feedstock received. Many compostable materials have very <br />distinctive odor -generating properties. Descriptions that contain the type and source of the material are <br />especially helpful; such as, "two week collection cycle, curbside green material," or "private hauler, <br />landscraper-collected, yard trimmings," or "morning -delivered, by end -dump, 95% moisture biosolids," <br />or <br />"unground, grocery produce with associated packaging by walking -floor trailer." <br />ii Compostable materials used on-site for beneficial use are generally considered removed from the site. <br />iii The distribution of receptors and their relationship to surrounding land use is extremely important. <br />The <br />description of surrounding land uses may also assist in identifying other potential odor sources. <br />iv An odor complaint receipt procedure is an integral part of the GIMP. The information provided by the <br />complainant can be extremely valuable to site operations personnel. A typical odor response protocol <br />might be: <br />When a complaint is received, designated site personnel will: <br />1. Obtain time, location, and nature or characteristics of the odor and record that information to <br />review for operational trends (see 4.). <br />2. If practical, proceed to the location of the complaint to verify that the site is indeed <br />responsible for <br />the odor. Otherwise, investigate the probable source of the odor complaint and implement <br />operational changes to minimize odors. <br />3. If warranted, meet with the LEA and complainant (if known and choosing to participate) <br />within a <br />reasonable time frame to discuss the nature of the source of the odor and operational changes <br />proposed and/or implemented. <br />4. Document the complaint(s) in the Operations/Complaint Log, including the nature of the <br />complaint <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.