My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_FINAL WMU FU-23 DESIGN RPT & CONCURRENCE LTRS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_FINAL WMU FU-23 DESIGN RPT & CONCURRENCE LTRS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2023 8:51:58 AM
Creation date
11/30/2023 9:10:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
FINAL WMU FU-23 DESIGN RPT & CONCURRENCE LTRS
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />WMU FINAL WMU FU-23 DESIGN REPORT 2-18-23 3-1 <br />SECTION 3 Slope Stability <br />In accordance with Title 27 regulations, static and seismic stability analyses were performed for <br />WMU FU-23. Refuse placed on the southern side of WMU FU-23 will be consistent with the final <br />landfill grades. The northern and eastern slopes of WMU FU-23 are temporary slopes and will be <br />filled against once adjacent cells to the east and north are constructed. The western refuse fill slope <br />overlies WMUs FU-17 and 19. Based on the geometry, construction against adjacent WMUs, and site <br />development plans, the planned maximum refuse fill elevation in WMU FU-23 is approximately 110- <br />feet. <br />Critical stability configurations were assessed based on the Construction Drawings and WMU FU-23 <br />refuse grading plan. The section analyzed is an east-west cross section through the eastern slope at <br />the maximum interim fill elevation of 110-ft MSL. <br />3.1 Analytical Method <br /> <br />STATIC ANALYSIS <br />The slope stability analyses were performed using the computer program XSTABL. The program <br />calculates slope stability using a limit equilibrium analysis based on the method of slices. The method <br />of slices estimates slope stability by assuming a shear surface and calculating the forces that would <br />cause slope movement, and the forces resisting slope movement for the selected shear surface. The <br />ratio of available shear strength (resisting forces) to mobilized shear strength (driving forces) is <br />known as the factor of safety. The computer programs employ a searching routine to determine the <br />critical shear surface with the minimum factor of safety. A factor of safety equal to 1.0 under static <br />loading conditions represents a condition of imminent failure. For temporary slopes, a minimum <br />factor of safety of 1.3 under static loading conditions is considered acceptable. Permanent slopes are <br />typically designed to achieve a minimum static factor of safety of 1.5. <br /> <br />SEISMIC ANALYSIS <br />During a seismic event, the propagation of bedrock motions induces a sequence of cyclic shear <br />stresses on the soil and refuse. These cyclic shear stresses result in cyclic strains. When the stresses <br />are above yield, a certain amount of strain remains, which produces permanent seismic deformations <br />in the soil or refuse. To estimate these seismic deformations, the Bray and Rathje, et al. (1998) <br />procedure was used. <br />When evaluating the results of a seismic deformation analysis, the effect of the net slope movement <br />should be considered. The most severe consequence of slope movement would be damage to the <br />composite base lining or LCRS of the landfill. While it is difficult to assess what deformation would <br />damage a composite base lining system, the current practice is to limit deformations to 30 cm (1 foot) <br />or less (Sharma and Lewis, 1994).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.