Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Forward Landfill – SIR 10 www.scsengineers.com <br /> <br />and accommodate anticipated future settlement. Construction will promote lateral surface water run- <br />off, which will minimize settlement effects. Access roads will be used to maintain the final cover area <br />and environmental control systems throughout the post-closure maintenance period. <br />The final grading plan for the Site will consist of a mounded surface surrounded by a perimeter <br />access road. Slopes of 3H:1V to 4H:1V. Furthermore, the top deck will have a minimum slope of 3 <br />percent and a permitted maximum elevation of 210 feet above mean sea level. <br />The final grading plan is presented in Figure 4. There are no anticipated changes to the final grading <br />plan due to the reduction in organic waste disposal. <br />12 SITE LIFE ESTIMATES <br />Section 6 includes a discussion on volumetric capacity impacts experienced by the Landfill resulting <br />from upstream organics diversion. The table presenting the volumetric capacity calculations for the <br />Site is included as Appendix B. The calculated waste intake due to upstream diversion equates to a <br />reduction in yearly airspace consumption and associated increase in the life of the Landfill from <br />2036 to 2037. <br />It should be noted that the actual landfill service life will be dependent on the waste quantity <br />disposed at the Landfill during the remaining service life of the landfill. The actual disposal tonnage, <br />and, therefore, the actual landfill service life, is influenced by many factors outside the control of the <br />Site; such as other regional landfills’ closing dates, the nature of the wastes, waste generation rates, <br />waste diversion rates, development activity in the region and consumer behavior. <br />13 ANCILLARY FACILITIES <br />Ancillary facilities related to MSW disposal operations at the Site include the entrance facilities area, <br />the scales and scalehouses, water production wells, support and storage areas (i.e. office training and <br />maintenance building), a transfer station/materials recovery facility and composting facility, a <br />groundwater extraction and treatment plant, and sedimentation basins. These facilities are not <br />expected to be impacted by the reduction of organic waste disposal. <br />The site also has a BFS and LFGTE facility that could be impacted due to the reduction of organic waste <br />disposal. The potential reduction to LFG generation due to the reduction of organic waste disposal and <br />the impacts on the Site are discussed in Section 9. <br />14 COST ESTIMATES FOR CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE <br />14.1 CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE <br />Cost estimates by Lewis Engineering were prepared for the final closure of the remaining 315 acres <br />(plan area) final footprint area in accordance with 27 CCR §21769(b)(2)(A) and §21790(b)(1). These <br />regulations require an estimate in current dollars of the cost of hiring a third party to closure the landfill <br />in accordance with the approved closure plan. Closure cost estimates include design, materials, <br />equipment, labor, administration and quality assurance for closure work. <br />The 2021 cost estimate included the assumptions that that foundation soils and vegetative cover soils <br />will be obtained from existing stockpiles or on-site borrow sources, and that existing environmental <br />controls such as the LFG extraction/monitoring system, LCRS system, groundwater monitoring wells <br />and other environmental control features are already in place and will not require significant upgrades