Laserfiche WebLink
Extraction wells in the deeper aquifers on the prison property are likely to draw the VOC contamination <br /> in the shallow, low permeable zone into the more permeable deeper zones and cause what appears to <br /> be the relatively contained VOC contamination in the shallow zone at the property to migrate into deeper <br /> soils and to further spread both on the prison property and potentially off site. <br /> These discoveries on the CDCR site, made once Forward and its consultants were finally allowed <br /> access to the prison facilities, show that the interim remedy in the CAO should be reconsidered. In <br /> addition, it should be noted that Forward has been directed by RWQCB staff not to undertake any <br /> additional site investigation activities on the prison property, which Forward and its consultants have <br /> previously recommended to the RWQCB on more than one occasion. Forward's consultants have <br /> identified multiple alternative options for remediation of the source area. We respectfully request that <br /> the RWQCB seriously consider the proposed remedial alternatives presented in the FS Addendum and <br /> encourage a coordinated effort with other responsible parties for the separate source area(s) on the <br /> CDCR property. <br /> Forward also respectfully requests the RWQCB comment on the multiple lines of evidence that suggest <br /> a separate VOC source area with total VOC concentrations >25 pg/L is also present beneath the <br /> residential property located at 7833 Newcastle Road and how this information affects the CAO <br /> requirements. <br /> 2) The alleged failure to submit a compliant Feasibility Study on the date specified in the CAO: 1 <br /> December 2019. <br /> To summarize the NOV, it is alleged that Forward failed to submit a Revised Engineering Feasibility <br /> Study in compliance with item 5.c of the CAO by December 1, 2019, because the June 30, 2023, <br /> submittal of the FS addendum was not certified by Forward and was therefore considered materially <br /> deficient. This certification error has since been corrected. The FS Addendum was resubmitted on <br /> August 25, 2023, with a certification statement included in the cover letter. <br /> Furthermore, in November 2019, Forward previously submitted the Groundwater Plume Investigation <br /> Report(GPIR) and Revised Engineering Feasibility Study(Revised FS) in accordance with Task 5.c of <br /> the CAO. To date, the RWQCB has not acknowledged or reviewed the November 2019 Revised FS. <br /> The Revised FS recommended submitting an addendum following further investigation of VOC <br /> concentrations downgradient of the Landfill,which were completed and are discussed in the June 2023 <br /> FS addendum. <br /> Forward has also submitted several technical reports documenting extensive assessment activities <br /> conducted to delineate an offsite source of TCE impacts in the vicinity of 7833 Newcastle Road <br /> including: <br /> - 7833 Newcastle Road Site Investigation Report, April 17, 2020 <br /> - Newcastle Road Site Investigation Report— Phase 2, November 6, 2020 <br /> - Newcastle Road Supplemental Site Investigation Report, November 20, 2020 <br /> To date, the RWQCB has not acknowledged its review of the reports and has provided no written <br /> comments regarding the data and findings from the report. <br /> The investigations of off-site properties described in this letter indicate that groundwater downgradient <br /> of the landfill is impacted by offsite source(s). This information was not available at the time the CAO <br /> was issued in 2017 and the offsite impacts must be considered for establishing background levels, <br /> cleanup targets and coordination with other responsible parties for remediation strategy. <br /> 3 <br />