Laserfiche WebLink
3) The alleged failure to restore beneficial uses of aquifer in the timeframe required by the CAO: 1 <br /> July 2023. <br /> To summarize the NOV, it is alleged that Forward failed to submit a Revised Engineering Feasibility <br /> Study that includes a proposal for a remedial action capable of stopping further migration of VOC- <br /> impacted groundwater beyond the Landfill's point of compliance (POC), as well as restoring the <br /> beneficial uses of the aquifer by July 1, 2023. However, Forward has already demonstrated to the <br /> RWQCB that the improvements to the groundwater extraction and treatment system at the Forward <br /> landfill have provided complete capture of VOCs at the Landfill's POC, meeting one of the Remedial <br /> Action Objectives (RAOs)stipulated in the CAO. <br /> Since February 2009, the groundwater extraction and treatment system designed to capture <br /> groundwater from the shallow and intermediate zones along the Landfill's POC has been improved with <br /> well rehabilitation efforts, the installation of additional groundwater recovery wells, and the construction <br /> of an artificial recharge basin. These improvements provided complete capture of VOCs at the POC, <br /> meeting one of the remedial action objectives (RAO) stipulated in the CAO (see enclosed figure and <br /> summary table). Combined with previous landfill enhancements, these improvements also resulted in <br /> downgradient water quality improvements by the creation of a clean groundwater waterfront migrating <br /> downgradient of the POC. Since the installation of the POC performance monitoring wells (AMW- <br /> 40S/M, AMW-41 S/M, AMW-42S/M, and AMW 43S/M), VOCs were not detected at concentrations <br /> above 0.5 pg/L in the following quarters: 1Q 2023, 4Q 2002, 3Q 2022, 2Q 2022, 1Q 2022, 4Q 2021, <br /> 3Q 2021, 1Q 2021, and 4Q 2020. Concentrations above detection levels were only observed in 2Q <br /> 2021 (AMW-41 M with 0.59 pg/L PCE) and 3Q 2020 (AMW-41 M with 0.53 pg/L TCE). This indicates <br /> that the clean waterfront has been migrating at least since the installation of the compliance points and <br /> likely before this point, when EW-5 was brought online at the end of 2019. <br /> As of March 2023, concentrations of PCE in groundwater potentially contributed by the Landfill (prior <br /> to establishment of the clean waterfront)within the shallow and intermediate zones slightly exceed the <br /> drinking water maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 5 micrograms per liter (pg/L). The plume that <br /> extends to the northeast of the separate offsite VOC source(s) on the CDCR property includes <br /> compliance wells with PCE concentrations that marginally exceed the MCL of 5 pg/L; however, access <br /> restrictions to the CDCR property from 2017 to 2021 had limited potential investigation of this offsite <br /> source and remedial action for these areas and subsequently delayed restoring the beneficial use of <br /> groundwater. <br /> Finally,the CAO does not require the restoring of all beneficial uses(however that term may be defined) <br /> in groundwater north of the landfill by July 1,2023.The 2017 CAO required Forward to submit combined <br /> reports by December 1, 2019, containing "a proposal for a remedial action capable of stopping further <br /> migration of VOC impacted groundwater beyond the point of compliance. as well as restoring the <br /> beneficial uses of groundwater in all zones affected by the release for the entire plume by 1 July 2023." <br /> (CAO, § 5(c)(iii)). Forward provided such a report to the RWQCB based on the information available to <br /> it at the time. In 2019, Forward did not have access to the prison property or know about the separate <br /> source of TCE contamination at 7833 Newcastle Road. Forward respectfully submits that the off-site <br /> contamination caused by these separate sources are not the result of"the release"from the landfill as <br /> described in the CAO. Forward has advised the RWQCB that further investigation of the CDCR property <br /> is required to fully understand the nature and extent of the contamination at the CDCR property (which, <br /> so far, the RWQCB has declined to authorize)and that remedial action other than extraction wells now <br /> appears to be the most appropriate means to deal with the off-site contamination at the prison facilities. <br /> 4 <br />