Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3-10 <br /> <br />3.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN COST ESTIMATES <br />The FSL NWRCAP cost estimates are based on the reasonably foreseeable impacts due to the causal events <br />discussed in the previous section. CalRecycle’s 2010 BMP and 2011 Technical Guidance Documents were <br />used to assess the causal events and develop the corresponding corrective action cost estimates. The <br />following landfill systems and features were evaluated for each corrective action scenario: <br /> Final Cover System (includes cover soil layers, vegetation, and grading) <br /> Landfill Gas Collection and Control System (GCCS) <br /> Stormwater Management / Drainage System Features <br /> Environmental Monitoring and Control Systems <br />Results of the causal event evaluations, and corresponding corrective actions and costs are presented <br />below in the following paragraphs. <br />3.1 Earthquake Causal Event <br />An earthquake is a reasonably foreseeable causal event in California. The Uniform California Earthquake <br />Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3) is a comprehensive model of earthquake occurrence for California. <br />UCERF3 represents the best available science for authoritative estimates of the magnitude, location, and <br />likelihood of potentially damaging earthquakes in California. UCERF3 was developed by the 2014 Working <br />Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP), a multi-disciplinary collaboration of leading <br />experts in seismology, geology, geodesy, paleoseismology, earthquake physics, and earthquake <br />engineering. The 2014 WGCEP predicted that the greater California region has > 99% probability of a 6.7 <br />magnitude earthquake occurring in the next 30 years. <br />Earthquakes can cause damage to a landfill and associated structures due to ground motions, liquefaction, <br />or fault rupture. Design standards are used to ensure that structures are designed to withstand the <br />ground movement and shaking, resulting from a certain size earthquake taking into consideration the <br />proximity and the geology between the location of the structure and faults. <br />3.1.1 Maximum Probable Earthquake vs. Maximum Credible Earthquake <br />Pursuant to Title 27 CCR §20370, a Class III landfill must be designed to withstand the Maximum Probable <br />Earthquake (MPE). In Title 27 CCR §20164, the MPE is defined as “the maximum earthquake that is likely <br />to occur during a 100-year interval.” For a site-specific NWRCAP, CalRecycle recommends evaluating the <br />impact on the landfill from the Maximum Credible Earthquake (CalRecycle 2011). A Maximum Credible <br />Earthquake (MCE) is defined in Title 27 CCR §20164, as the “maximum earthquake that appears capable <br />of occurring under the presently known geologic framework.” For purposes of compliance with Title 27 <br />CCR §22101(b)(2), the MCE was used to prepare the FSL NWRCAP. <br />3.1.2 Maximum Credible Earthquake and Peak Ground Motion <br />Determination <br />A Seismic Characterization of the FSL site was performed to determine the MCE and resulting ground <br />motions occurring at the FSL site (see Appendix A). A review of all faults located within 100 kilometers of